TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Revenue on Medium

78 点作者 brandonlipman大约 9 年前

9 条评论

xenadu02大约 9 年前
&quot;Select&quot; publishers, with no mention of plans for general availability?<p>Meet the New Media overlords, same as the Old Media overlords. Sure, anyone can throw something up on Medium. But only the blessed can get paid.<p>Also calling it now: special deals for certain publishers while the plebs get a lower pay rate. Of course if they made it based on popularity &#x2F; page views then it will just encourage click-bait articles even more so it&#x27;s a somewhat damned-if-you-do scenario.
评论 #11435246 未加载
评论 #11435580 未加载
评论 #11434920 未加载
tonyedgecombe大约 9 年前
&quot;Publishers in the beta may create sponsored content on behalf of or in association with brands. For some publishers, Medium will provide paid opportunities to execute high-quality native campaigns on behalf of brands.&quot;<p>I guess this is what happens when we all block ads.
评论 #11435224 未加载
评论 #11434682 未加载
评论 #11434888 未加载
评论 #11435595 未加载
评论 #11434570 未加载
评论 #11435403 未加载
amelius大约 9 年前
Why would anyone publish specifically on Medium, if one can publish practically anywhere on the web (and reap the full benefits)? Is it because Medium provides discoverability? I can&#x27;t believe that is true because for me HN provides better discoverability, and as a bonus it covers more than just Medium.
评论 #11435254 未加载
mbesto大约 9 年前
Long story short. Native advertising.
评论 #11434828 未加载
rayalez大约 9 年前
Awww, crap. I love medium, I really hoped they won&#x27;t go with advertising, what a way to decrease the value and quality of the platform.<p>Member-supported publishing, on the other hand, sounds awesome. That&#x27;s exactly what I think the modern web needs. A straightforward no-bullshit way to monetize quality content. If it&#x27;s worth buying - people will buy it. The major obstacle was inconvenience, and medium could solve it.<p>If only they&#x27;d keep it to member-supported publishing, it would be fantastic. They might not have made as much money, but they&#x27;d keep their integrity and have gained a lot of good will.<p>But now, with sponsored content, I&#x27;m not so sure I want to stay on the platform.
pboutros大约 9 年前
The monetization strategy reveals itself! I&#x27;m always intrigued by subscriptions to individual content producers.
评论 #11434313 未加载
评论 #11434447 未加载
评论 #11434931 未加载
techthroway443大约 9 年前
Still no idea how this site works.<p>Is it meant to be a twitter feed for blog posts?
评论 #11435515 未加载
avivo大约 9 年前
I thought there was finally a proven business model pioneered by blendle for these sorts of articles (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;launch.blendle.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;launch.blendle.com&#x2F;</a>).<p>Automatically pay per article, but have it be trivially refundable (to discourage low quality&#x2F;clickbait). Is it just not profitable enough? Do they not control a large enough platform?
cryptos大约 9 年前
Paid content will undermine the credibility. It is one of the worst inventions in the web business!