TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Websites That Feed Hacker News: Top Sources of Submissions by Median Score

134 点作者 anton_tarasenko大约 9 年前

16 条评论

danso大约 9 年前
This is a pretty good example of how certain metrics aren&#x27;t always relevant to reality, or, at least match the headline. The word &quot;feed&quot; implies that HN depends on the contributions from&#x2F;links to these sites, but most users of HN would argue that domains such as github.com, github.io, nytimes.com, etc. are far more prevalent and important to HN than virtually any of the domains listed here. HN depends on daily, traffic...It&#x27;s not that the sites with high medians aren&#x27;t <i>good</i>, but they don&#x27;t &quot;feed&quot; HN...Median score in this context is a trivial metric. Number of top stories, daily, by domain would be far more relevant in showing what &quot;feeds the beast&quot;, as they say in the media business.
评论 #11500032 未加载
评论 #11499917 未加载
anton_tarasenko大约 9 年前
<i>The link is updated to reflect the following</i><p>After SeanDav&#x27;s question and minimaxir&#x27;s comment, I summed up reposts&#x27; scores before computing the mean and the median:<p>HN news sources by <i>mean score</i>: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;spreadsheets&#x2F;d&#x2F;1tTDDG2xg7OVKdUy4WCZ_5__17u_IOM4WPpbmnZDbxUI&#x2F;edit?usp=sharing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;spreadsheets&#x2F;d&#x2F;1tTDDG2xg7OVKdUy4WCZ_...</a><p>HN news sources by <i>median score</i>: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;spreadsheets&#x2F;d&#x2F;1P20sKg-fI6msZVZtJFe0UHozX94AUINsiG_-1mbpaoo&#x2F;edit?usp=sharing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;spreadsheets&#x2F;d&#x2F;1P20sKg-fI6msZVZtJFe0...</a><p>HN news sources by <i>number of submissions</i>: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;spreadsheets&#x2F;d&#x2F;1mmfbNWaX0Nr1P65VmwZpm4WiceK7pepknSob4ti0M7s&#x2F;edit?usp=sharing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;spreadsheets&#x2F;d&#x2F;1mmfbNWaX0Nr1P65VmwZp...</a><p>SQL code: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;antontarasenko&#x2F;smq&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;hackernews&#x2F;top-domains-median.sql" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;antontarasenko&#x2F;smq&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;hackernews...</a><p>How-to: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;antontarasenko&#x2F;smq" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;antontarasenko&#x2F;smq</a>
评论 #11499734 未加载
cowpig大约 9 年前
I really find it discouraging that Sam Altman is at the top of that list. Most of his articles fall into two categories: promoting things that will make him money directly[1], or myopic musings&#x2F;self-serving advice to people that will make him money indirectly[2].<p>Is the HN algorithm rigged in favour of things he writes, or does this community really get a lot out the things he says?<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.samaltman.com&#x2F;asana" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.samaltman.com&#x2F;asana</a><p>[2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.samaltman.com&#x2F;the-tech-bust-of-2015" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.samaltman.com&#x2F;the-tech-bust-of-2015</a> made me laugh, for example
评论 #11501699 未加载
评论 #11501510 未加载
bbarn大约 9 年前
Surprised not to see <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nautil.us&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nautil.us&#x2F;</a> on here. I have to avoid clicking articles to not spoil my print version I see them so often on here.<p>FWIW, if anyone from that site&#x2F;mag are frequent HN readers, HN is the reason I subscribed, and gifted subscriptions to several of my family for xmas this year.
评论 #11503082 未加载
jedberg大约 9 年前
Besides cutting off at 10 submissions,you should probably also throw away anything that got say 2 points or less. Something like medium is brought way down by all the submissions that got 1 point, which means they probably never got seen. HN lets you resubmit low scoring items exactly for this reason.
koolba大约 9 年前
I&#x27;d be more interested in seeing the distribution across submissions that actually made the front page.<p>There&#x27;s a daily deluge of articles from ars, techcrunch, nytimes, etc, so the (tons) of articles that do get to the top get penalized by the ones that don&#x27;t.<p>I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s a flag for &quot;hit front page&quot; so might have to estimate that with a min point filter instead.
anton_tarasenko大约 9 年前
A brief motivation for the parameters:<p>1. Sorting by the median. The mean is not very informative for the quality of the source. Most sources provide low-scored content with eventual hits that drive the mean up. The median fixes this problem.<p>2. Cutting off at 10 submissions. An arbitrary minimum to exclude pure luck from the results.<p>In the end, this ranking excludes websites like github.com and youtube.com, but it features some less known sources.
评论 #11499914 未加载
qntty大约 9 年前
It would be interesting to compute the h-index for all HN submissions, with score instead of citations, then sort them from highest to lowest.
SeanDav大约 9 年前
Not sure how accurate this, alternatively it might need different assumptions - What about: NYTimes, WSJ, GitHub, BBC, ArsTechnica, Medium etc?
评论 #11499340 未加载
jhchen大约 9 年前
How is paulgraham.com not on this list?
评论 #11499775 未加载
评论 #11499782 未加载
adam-ff大约 9 年前
This morning an article I visited from the front page had only been around 21 seconds and already had 60 comments.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;1oyIv2d" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;1oyIv2d</a>
kevindeasis大约 9 年前
I&#x27;m surprised I don&#x27;t see medium in here.<p>Even more, I&#x27;m starting to see more post from medium nowadays that has declining quality relative to 2015.
评论 #11500035 未加载
hashatlas大约 9 年前
In the future, post this as CSV and GitHub will turn it into an even-nicer tabular format. Not to mention retaining the machine readability.
happyslobro大约 9 年前
Ha! Look at Chris Granger go! Don&#x27;t get me wrong, his work is awesome, but it&#x27;s pretty funny to see an individual in the top 10.
morisy大约 9 年前
Interesting but weird. Some of these sites don&#x27;t seem to exist (anymore?), like muckandbrass.com
评论 #11499493 未加载
spoiledtechie大约 9 年前
I&#x27;m gonna put money on it, that the big hitters in the list, probably game hacker news a bit by asking their friends to vote them up.
评论 #11500962 未加载