TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Faces E.U. Antitrust Charges Over Android Apps

19 点作者 axg大约 9 年前

6 条评论

DiabloD3大约 9 年前
They aren&#x27;t going to make it very far with this. Phones are now required to bundle these services, and Samsung ships phones that uses S replacements for everything (launcher, health, payments, music, app store, cloud storage, camera&#x2F;photos, and a few others), yet runs Android.<p>Not only that, Google provides APIs in newer versions of Androids that allow third party apps to provide all this stuff. When installing apps that provide those services, they just need to use the APIs to integrate into the system.<p>Such as, I have OneDrive installed, and Google Drive and OneDrive appear as accessible from any app that uses the new file loader API (which was introduced in ... 4.x?). Google is working with Microsoft to allow Cortana to be a full replacement for Google Now&#x27;s &quot;Okay Google&quot; trigger, including &quot;Hey Cortana&quot; trigger while sleeping (on phones that support that).<p>I can also install any office suite I want without any API support required, I can also install third party music players (and get full music player API support and Chromecast support for players that support it), third party... anything. Even a third party app store.<p>From what I can tell, this is all about the Google Now launcher supporting Google Search only. You can install any launcher you want. Google Now cannot integrate into other search engines because of THEIR lack of an API, not because Google doesn&#x27;t want to (I mean, they don&#x27;t, but it&#x27;s not their fault).<p>The EU needs to step off and stop ruining company&#x27;s products. This is literally a repeat of Microsoft Windows shipping a browser and a media player , where <i>any</i> browser and media player could be used instead. The EU at the time, apparently, could not understand you could have multiple apps installed that do the same thing, and file types and URL types have associations that can be changed by the user.<p>The EU is dangerously clueless about technology.<p>And if they&#x27;re not going after Apple for the same charge, where they <i>won&#x27;t</i> let you use third party browsers on iOS, or third party app stores, or music players, or whatever, then they&#x27;re just untrustworthy idiots that have no clue how the world works.
评论 #11529310 未加载
评论 #11529066 未加载
ultramancool大约 9 年前
Hmm, interesting that Google, who allows 3rd party markets and non-Google signed app installs (like Amazon, F-Droid, Aptoide, etc) is getting hit with this.<p>Perhaps it&#x27;s more related to stock Google Apps they&#x27;re shipping with Android devices, similar to the MS bundling IE anti-trust cases? Google&#x27;s Android apps are pretty great and having them ship on devices for free is probably a pretty big killer of competition, including these apps may even be a requirement to be allowed to ship play store.
评论 #11531521 未加载
enjo大约 9 年前
Surely Apple is going to face the same charge?
评论 #11529043 未加载
评论 #11529005 未加载
Arzh大约 9 年前
&quot;and consumers have the last word about which apps they want to use on their devices.&quot; Is this true in the EU? Do the carriers and hardware manufacturers not bundle in a bunch of total garbage that you aren&#x27;t allowed to remove (sometimes you can disable it but like I want any of this crap from LG)?
评论 #11528897 未加载
tdkl大约 9 年前
The latest in EU tech money grabs - those failed banks aren&#x27;t going to pay for themselves.
cloudjacker大约 9 年前
I&#x27;m waiting for the antitrust violation launched by developers.<p>With arbitrary reasons their apps get removed, sometimes surprisingly brazen feature copying by the store owner, and lack of humans or any transparency in the appeal process.