TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: After BitCoin, can we expect BitGov?

2 点作者 assane101大约 9 年前
BitCoin succeeded to challenge the established currency system with no centralized authority. Can we expect the same thing to happen to Democracy, a kind of BitGov, ruling and collecting tax (bitcoin?) with no head of State ?

2 条评论

drdeca大约 9 年前
Well, in practice, probably not?<p>Will someone make some sort of software for it?<p>They probably already have, sorta.<p>But, for taxing specifically?<p>I don&#x27;t think that would work very well.<p>In order to tax bitcoin, you would have to force transactions to include transfers of bitcoin to the decentralized government.<p>Afaict, this would require either changing how bitcoin works specifically to accommodate this, or using some sort of threat to get people to pay the taxes.<p>Bitcoiners probably wouldn&#x27;t be fond of either idea.<p>And the second idea would, uh, require some sort of force outside of computers, which would probably be prevented by the existing state, and even if it did &quot;work&quot; it probably wouldn&#x27;t be decentralized.<p>Buffoon isn&#x27;t really fully anonymous, but it is anonymous enough that taxing it would be infeasible I think?<p>Some other cryptocurrency could be created which has taxation built in, and a voting system which determines the amount of taxes etc., but I don&#x27;t think adding it on to bitcoin as an external thing is feasible, at least not without using an already existing state.
评论 #11534704 未加载
andreicon大约 9 年前
Are you kidding? Devs can&#x27;t find consensus on simple matters like block size, do you expect them to maintain the software that will be used for our decision-making process? That was a good laugh!
评论 #11534225 未加载