Fresh evidence links Saudi government to 9/11

A British friend told me to mostly ignore articles from The Daily Mail because they were British equivalent of US tabloids like National Enquirier. Worth keeping in mind here.

Just to make it clear to everyone: The US has done a really good job of (I assume deliberately) screwing the Saudis over the last couple of years. Firstly the Iran agreement has shown them nothing is off the table, secondly the US shale oil has given the US maneuvering room by crashing the oil market, and finally this set of &quot;leaks&quot; is showing the Saudis that they had better fall in line.<p>Exactly what the US wants isn&#x27;t clear to me though. Maybe cutting off funds to ISIS?

I find the envelope part unconvincing. I am just as likely to re use an old envelope myself for random documents.

I never thought I would see a Daily Mail article on Hacker News<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;shouldireadthedailymail.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;shouldireadthedailymail.com</a>

Seems a little fishy. I would expect a greater level of operational security from a Saudi Arabian official in the position to be involved here. If you knew the long term plan why would you ever hand someone a key piece of evidence in an envelope bearing your own information? Even if you didn&#x27;t personally know the long term plan, ensuring the certificate is untraceable in all forms seems like something you&#x27;d of been made to understand.

Is mail sent from foreign embassies within the U.S. protected in any way, similar to the contents of a diplomatic bag? Does it make any sense that someone associated with the Saudi Embassy in D.C. would use an official letter to exfil sensitive documents like the pilot certificate? Sure doesn&#x27;t seem like a wise move, but some sort of legal protections might make the scenario more plausible.

Just watch this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;paul.j.watson.71&#x2F;videos&#x2F;10154130107166171&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;paul.j.watson.71&#x2F;videos&#x2F;10154130107...</a>

The daily mail strike again !

building 7<p>united 93, no plane debris<p>&quot;plane&quot; strikes exact area where pentagon was doing audit of $2.3 trillion, noted missing the day before by Rumsfield... also debris don&#x27;t resemble plane crash<p>explosions in the bottom floor of WTC<p>perfect implosion of towers<p>Saudi govt had nothing to do with all that, real enemy is likely closer to home

This is blocked behind a paywall.

daily mail version of the story: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dailymail.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;article-3549402&#x2F;Fresh-evidence-links-Saudi-government-9-11-Flight-certificate-bomber-embassy-envelope-buried-underground.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dailymail.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;article-3549402&#x2F;Fresh-eviden...</a>

&gt; Victims&#x27; families have been pushing Congress for the right to sue Saudi Arabia over the death of their loved ones<p>God bless America. The default response to everything is to sue.