TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The impact of Prince’s death on Wikipedia

253 点作者 The_ed17大约 9 年前

10 条评论

semi-extrinsic大约 9 年前
For others who were left scratching their heads at what exactly this pop-sci-explained PoolCounter mechanism actually is:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wikitech.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;PoolCounter" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wikitech.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;PoolCounter</a><p>TL;DR:<p>It&#x27;s a limiter on how many workers start rendering the new page version when the old page version in cache has been invalidated.
评论 #11557994 未加载
评论 #11557440 未加载
Buge大约 9 年前
Interesting how in the graph it looks like some people found out about 25 minutes before it was more publicly found out.
评论 #11557418 未加载
评论 #11557239 未加载
评论 #11557262 未加载
评论 #11557206 未加载
评论 #11557271 未加载
lordnacho大约 9 年前
How are Wikipedia articles kept consistent with each other? Say someone like Prince dies. His page will instantly change, seemingly while his portrait is still in the sky and the cannon fires.<p>But with certain people there&#x27;s a variety of connected items that need referential integrity. For instance, I can imagine Prince being on one of those lists (eg highest grossing) that has bold text for still living artist. For office holders, they need to be moved from &quot;incumbent&quot; to a box with dates and the new incumbent needs to be updated. And then there&#x27;s text snippets that are in present tense (&quot;Prince and David Bowie are among the greatest living artists&quot;).<p>And then there&#x27;s the corresponding pages in other languages.<p>How&#x27;s it done?
评论 #11559497 未加载
评论 #11558943 未加载
chris_wot大约 9 年前
I don&#x27;t think WMF staff are credited enough for the work they do in keeping Wikipedia running. They seriously know how to scale, I think the only ones better than them are honestly Facebook and Twitter!
评论 #11558148 未加载
评论 #11557909 未加载
评论 #11557159 未加载
评论 #11557150 未加载
JBReefer大约 9 年前
This is so impressive, to see behind the curtains of what has become the central repository of humanities knowledge, during a moment of loss of one of humanity&#x27;s greats.
评论 #11558516 未加载
评论 #11566240 未加载
评论 #11558001 未加载
yeukhon大约 9 年前
They mentioned 5M views within 24 hours of Michael Jackson&#x27;s death. With over 3B Internet users out there, I am actually a little surprised how small the spike was. Did they only count English Wikipedia? Even so I am quite surprised. I would expect 10-20M at least. Similarly, many young people like myself have never heard of Prince, I had to look him up to find out who he truly was.
评论 #11558415 未加载
评论 #11559341 未加载
评论 #11557874 未加载
评论 #11559027 未加载
cmdrfred大约 9 年前
What happened at 7:15?
评论 #11557170 未加载
评论 #11557940 未加载
EugeneOZ大约 9 年前
Even in peak it&#x27;s just ~800 hits per second - it shows how is irrelevant the C10k problem (yes, I know it&#x27;s not exactly about hits per second, but still).
评论 #11557676 未加载
评论 #11557359 未加载
评论 #11557376 未加载
xrstf大约 9 年前
Finally a replacement for &quot;Site got slashdotted&quot;: &quot;Site got Prince&#x27;d&quot;. I like it.
tgb大约 9 年前
&quot;He was ... known for, among many other things, ... a performance at Super Bowl XLI in a raining downpour in front of over a hundred million people.&quot;<p>Typo and&#x2F;or I call bullshit.
评论 #11557172 未加载
评论 #11557136 未加载
评论 #11557149 未加载
评论 #11557203 未加载