TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

David Rose: Why NY Angels Charges Entrepreneurs

31 点作者 Cmccann7大约 15 年前
Matt Mireles just wrote up a post quoting David Rose the "The Father of Angel Investing in NY" on why he charges entrepreneurs. Wondering what everyone here thinks about his response?

11 条评论

davidsrose大约 15 年前
Folks, I realize that Jason and Matt have set me up to take the fall here as some kind of epitome of evil, and I certainly understand that people don't think it makes sense for us to charge any application fees. I've explained our reasoning for why we charge the $150 fee (not the $15,000 fees that were the subject of Jason's original jihad), and I completely agree that (a) it is imperfect, and (b) the subject is a valid one for rational discussion. But before everyone gets out their pitchforks and torches, I'd appreciate it if we could all work from the same set of facts, which are as follows:<p>1) New York Angels is not a scam. We have invested over $40 million into 60 startup ventures over the past six years, all from our own personal pockets and not from other people's money.<p>2) New York Angels is not a venture fund. Unlike VCs, who receive 2% of their entire fund every year to pay their salaries and cover their expenses, none of us get paid a penny, and we pay for our own expenses.<p>3) New York Angels is not a money-making entity. Think about it for a minute. We each pay $3,500 out of our own pockets each year to fund our operations, and not one of us gets one penny from anything any entrepreneur pays. How on earth can this be a "money making operation", Jason??<p>4) New York Angels is not a bunch of Wall Street people. It is made up mostly of leading tech entrepreneurs in New York. Our current and former members include the entrepreneur/founders of companies such as About.com, Register.com, Mimeo, PC Forum, Gartner Group, Gilder Lehrman Group, LinkShare, MovieFone, Afternic, 24/7 Media, Technology Solutions, IGN.com, Unwired Technologies, Half.com, Core Software, Research Board, IdeaLab NY, TACODA, MNP, and TargetSpot.<p>5) New York Angels is not a bunch of tire kickers. Every one of our members commits to investing at least $50,000 each year into companies that present to the group. Unlike many other 'groups' that are full of, and funded by, service providers, 100% of the people you present to are accredited investors who are committed to writing checks.<p>6) New York Angels is not private club for only well-connected, insider entrepreneurs. Unlike many angel groups, VCs and individual angels, we accept (and read) applications from anyone who applies to us. We don't (yet) require that you know someone, or have connections.<p>7) New York Angels is not lazy. Every month our angel members meet personally with 10-15 companies looking for funding, of whom 3-5 are asked to come back a second time to present their pitch to the whole group. Before their presentation they are provided extensive personal coaching, and after their presentation they typically have at least one two hour in-depth session with interested investors.<p>8) New York Angels is not clueless. We've had exits to companies such as CBS and Kodak with returns of up to 12x, and co-invest regularly with half a dozen top-ranked venture funds. We recently ran an analysis of our current portfolio, and while it wasn't as impressive as that of FRC or KPCB, it came in as being roughly in the second quartile from the top relative to the returns of most US venture funds over the past five years.<p>So, here I am, ready to discuss the question of application fees calmly, but it's really hard to do that when quite a few of the anonymous posters seem to want to blindly hurl personal attacks that simply aren't true.<p>David S. Rose Chairman, New York Angels Personal investor in over 75 startups
评论 #1156714 未加载
评论 #1156651 未加载
jasonmcalacanis大约 15 年前
We get over 100 folks applying to each event in the Open Angel Forum.<p>As an angel investor I sort through this AS PART OF MY JOB. I don't need $150 to filter out the bad ones--I can tell in two minutes if something is really bad.<p>TechCrunch50 doesn't charge either and we get 1,000 folks to apply for that. Again, IT IS OUR JOB to sort through these. We don't need to charge the startups.<p>This is a really lame excuse in my mind. If you're not willing to sort through applications--which take minutes to process--why be an angel investor or run an angel group?<p>Open Angel Forum is now in four cities and we are coming to New York City in April. We should be in 15-20 cities two years from now and I think we can do enough by having the lawyers, accountants and headhunters pay to attended/sponsor to cover any costs.<p>David is a nice guy, but he's lazy I think.
评论 #1156131 未加载
pg大约 15 年前
If the money is really just to test applicants' seriousness, they should donate it to charity.
评论 #1156046 未加载
matthewer大约 15 年前
As a New Yorker, I can honestly say I don't think I have ever heard anyone actually pitch NYA. David Rose frequently gives how to get funding talks, and they all sound the same.<p>NYA's portfolio of companies is simply un-compelling: <a href="http://newyorkangels.com/portfolio/default.html" rel="nofollow">http://newyorkangels.com/portfolio/default.html</a><p>How can an organization like this compete against innovative forms of funding like Betaworks and Founder's Collective?
评论 #1156739 未加载
MediaSquirrel大约 15 年前
I've been getting a lot of shit for calling them out on this. Curious what others think of this.
评论 #1156736 未加载
aswanson大约 15 年前
Classic scam, seen it before in charging starving musicians $150 a piece for "auditions" with so-called A &#38; R's associated with record labels. One of the lowest forms of bloodsucking on the planet.
评论 #1156193 未加载
评论 #1156111 未加载
hristov大约 15 年前
I think that a smaller fee like $150 would not really be a problem. This may be viewed as an administrative fee to have a paid person review each application.<p>When the fees go up to $1000 and over, then it becomes problematic, because then the application fees are obviously a source of profit. And if the angels or the entrepreneur forum or whatever make money from the application process they have little incentive to actually make investments.
评论 #1156004 未加载
评论 #1156016 未加载
rmorrison大约 15 年前
Seems to me that it's against their best interest to limit the pool of of available business plans, which is what the $150 application fee does.<p>If I were an angel investor, I would ideally want to receive every business plan ever created in hopes that I at least have the option to invest in the next GOOG or APPL. Then it'd be up to me to quickly sort out the junky ones.
评论 #1156401 未加载
petewarden大约 15 年前
How about $175 just to get in the door for an afternoon of schmoozing with VCs?<p><a href="http://petewarden.typepad.com/searchbrowser/2010/02/vcs-ill-be-avoiding.html" rel="nofollow">http://petewarden.typepad.com/searchbrowser/2010/02/vcs-ill-...</a>
kevinholesh大约 15 年前
Wonder what Mr. Calacanis thinks of these logical reasons...<p><a href="http://calacanis.com/2009/10/09/why-startups-shouldnt-have-to-pay-to-pitch-angel-investors/" rel="nofollow">http://calacanis.com/2009/10/09/why-startups-shouldnt-have-t...</a>
Cmccann7大约 15 年前
Surprisingly Jason has kept quiet on this specific case even after a couple entreprenuers have pointed this out. hmm....