TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The MakerBot Obituary

146 点作者 szczys大约 9 年前

16 条评论

fudged71大约 9 年前
I have been in 3D printing for over three years now and it has been gut-wrenching to watch Makerbot&#x27;s actions. Like watching a crash test dummy, you can see the moves coming and it&#x27;s beautiful and destructive at the same time.<p>Makerbot systematically SOLD their founding values. Open source, open community, independant, and made in america (new york).<p>These values appealed to the early adopters. And by taking large amounts of venture capital, Bre effectively decided to accelerate crossing the chasm by incrementally tossing each of these values aside as they were potential liabilities for mainstream adoption. He was maximizing shareholder value rather than catering to the customers of his products. Their patent strategy was clearly to increase their value to acquirers (Stratasys or 3D Systems). And by aiming so high on the acquisition negotiations they tanked the stock of every single industrial 3D printing company, who have all operated for decades longer than Makerbot.<p>I hope that Ultimaker and Printrbot stick to their values and gain significant market share. I&#x27;m not confident that Lulzbot&#x27;s libre values will translate to a thriving marketshare and ecosystem.<p>One note on the article though... There is no way that Zach and Adam walked away with $100M each, where did that come from? I&#x27;m sure they must have been diluted significantly. If not, I&#x27;m very interested how that happened if anyone knows!
评论 #11605340 未加载
评论 #11607821 未加载
jfoutz大约 9 年前
I have cupcake #40 with the wooden pulleys for belts. It was an incredibly fun project, assembling, soldering, general fuzing around to keep the thing working. It requires probably 2 hours of fiddling for each hour of printing. It felt momentous because it kind of was, me and perhaps a hundred other people toiling away, bringing the future to reality.<p>i&#x27;m sad to see the state they&#x27;re in. I hope, dearly hope, that that spirit of the year or so i spent caring for my cupcake is how humanity ends up, at least for some of humanity. building kits, patching code, struggling with the odd issue. It really felt like pushing the frontier of the human experience. we can&#x27;t all expand the frontier of theoretical knowledge, but we can all push a frontier. It&#x27;s a lovely place to be.<p>Sitting in my basement week after week, heck, month after month trying to get a good sequence of prints, that was a great time in my life. I don&#x27;t think much will come of 3d printing of abs plastic. Super customized shapes are just not that interesting. Perhaps VR will simplify the design process, which i kind of hated.<p>At the start, right at the beginning of makerbot, they were wonderful.
beardicus大约 9 年前
It was interesting to watch an open hardware company wrassle with profitability and scale vs. &quot;being a good citizen&quot;. The two aren&#x27;t mutually exclusive, though it seemed like Makerbot thought that was the case. Oh well. Goodbye Makerbot. Thanks for building upon the RepRap and for pushing 3d printing out into the mainstream. Sorry you abandoned your roots and got swallowed up into the megabusiness garbagescape.
评论 #11604388 未加载
Animats大约 9 年前
The real problem is that MakerBot didn&#x27;t keep up with the technology. Extruding hot ABS filament and hoping it would bond to the previous layer just isn&#x27;t a very good technology. The Form1, Form2, and Ember, all stereolithography machines, produce much better parts. There are half a dozen extruder type printers better than the MakerBot, and some are cheaper.<p>MakerBot just didn&#x27;t get better fast enough.
评论 #11604706 未加载
评论 #11605732 未加载
wpietri大约 9 年前
One of the questions I have: what are 3D printers in this weight class being used for beyond novelty?<p>I like shiny tech as much as anybody here, and I&#x27;m certainly excited by the <i>potential</i> of 3D printing. But companies eventually have to survive on <i>actual</i> revenues. And for people who make tools, that generally means their customers have to use the tools to make money.<p>As an example, my brother makes custom wood furniture, so he buys saws and saw blades. As long as people want wood furniture for their homes, saw-makers get a slice of that. What are 3D printer makers getting a slice of to sustain their business?
评论 #11605024 未加载
dade_大约 9 年前
I think it was spring of 2012 when I visited Manhattan to buy a 3D printer. I wanted to see one first hand and visited the store in (or around) Soho, and while the store had some great models printed and the staff were enthusiastic, they really didn&#x27;t sell me on why I should buy one from Makerbot. I did see 3D printing first hand, and decided I would definitely get a printer. Coincidentally, I visited Hack Manhattan that night and a fellow (forgotten his name...) was building a beta PrintrBot Simple and explained why he thought Makerbot wasn&#x27;t a good design, why Ultimaker is a much better product (extruder feed motor placement, speed, accuracy, and reliability) and finally, the most important, that no one buying their first 3D printer should be spending 2000 dollars. Get a PrintrBot kit, spend a few hundred bucks and upgrade when needed. It was great advice. There are many design files on the Internet, but it was really CAD that I needed to learn. And in the meantime, there was so much to learn about printing: different materials, filament suppliers, how to deal with calibration, optimize slicing options, troubleshoot extrusion speeds, filament quality, and printing temperatures to name a few. It&#x27;s been nearly 4 years, the little PrintrBot Jr kit has been discontinued, but it still works well and I will probably upgrade this year. The technology and features available are far better today (OMG auto levelling beds) and I want a much larger printing area and faster printer. Makerbot provided a brand for 3D printing, but also a promise that it was ready for consumers. They really weren&#x27;t, and probably still aren&#x27;t. Further, CAD and 3D modelling are not trivial skills to acquire. Regardless of the future of the company and their missteps, they did bring about massive consumer awareness of the technology.
beagle3大约 9 年前
Relevant: Zach &quot;Hoeken&quot; Smith&#x27;s (one of the founders of Makerbot) thoughts when the company changed direction (and he was out): <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hoektronics.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;09&#x2F;21&#x2F;makerbot-and-open-source-a-founder-perspective&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hoektronics.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;09&#x2F;21&#x2F;makerbot-and-open-sour...</a>
wodahs02大约 9 年前
I followed MakerBot pretty obsessively since its early days. I have to agree with some of the comments here. It was very clear after they raised venture money that they became a marketing machine. I suspect they were burning quite lot of money to grab marketshare and become the de facto personal 3D printer. They pawned that thing off at the right time and let it become someone else&#x27;s problem. Classic venture playbook.
评论 #11604897 未加载
jack9大约 9 年前
&gt; ignored the unspoken rules of Open Source hardware<p>Implied that the rule is &quot;Open Source hardware can succeed if others (you or China) don&#x27;t just clone it?&quot; The rule is that it WILL be cloned.
ChuckMcM大约 9 年前
I bought a &quot;Replicator 2, Dual Extruder&quot; with the Mark 7 extruders, it was the last fully open source printer they made. What I liked about it is that it is so open source its easy to fix. Its also rather poorly implemented in that the drive mechanisms fail, the nuts loosen, it didn&#x27;t come with an enclosed build space etc etc. However it has been a solid platform for experimenting on. Playing with the BondTech extruder (<i>much</i> better than Makerbot) the E3D hotend (<i>much</i> better melt zone control) different driver architectures. I think if I was buying one fresh I&#x27;d probably get a Lulzbot for the same reason.<p>On the one hand its sad to see them die, on the other it created some very wealthy folks who might angel invest in new even cooler stuff. Circle of life.
dankohn1大约 9 年前
My 9yo loved his 3-D printing spring break camp last week [0].<p>Any views on the Monoprice 3-D printers? [1] It seems hard to compete with Shapeways [2], if we&#x27;re willing to wait a day for shipping. As with lots of technology, it&#x27;s hard to buy a 3-D printer given how much they improve each year.<p>They used TinkerCAD at the camp. Should he stay with it or is there better online software for a beginner?<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pixelacademy.org&#x2F;spring&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pixelacademy.org&#x2F;spring&#x2F;</a> [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.monoprice.com&#x2F;product?c_id=107&amp;cp_id=10724&amp;cs_id=1072403&amp;p_id=13860&amp;seq=1&amp;format=2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.monoprice.com&#x2F;product?c_id=107&amp;cp_id=10724&amp;cs_id...</a> [2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.shapeways.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.shapeways.com&#x2F;</a> [3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tinkercad.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tinkercad.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #11604746 未加载
CamperBob2大约 9 年前
<i>Like every aspect of a business, the value of the brand and reputation is tracked as an asset, and is called “goodwill” in company reports. For every quarterly report Stratasys has released after the acquisition of MakerBot, a goodwill impairment charge – a markdown on the value of the MakerBot brand – has been recorded. Including the 2015 yearly report, Stratasys has taken a total goodwill impairment charge of nearly one Billion dollars for MakerBot. Keep in mind Stratasys acquired MakerBot for $403 Million in stock. Stratasys has written off nearly double the value it paid through the failures of the MakerBot brand.</i><p>How exactly does &quot;goodwill impairment&quot; work? A billion dollar tax writeoff?! This sounds like some kind of scam.
评论 #11604938 未加载
评论 #11604906 未加载
alayne大约 9 年前
After I saw Print the Legend I assumed MakerBot would crash and burn.
timrpeterson大约 9 年前
Really interesting read. I had no idea. Hope it gets some up votes so that more knowledgeable people will comment.
评论 #11589647 未加载
评论 #11604678 未加载
atomical大约 9 年前
The average consumer hasn&#x27;t even heard of open source. I think this point is really overstated in the article.
评论 #11604598 未加载
JabavuAdams大约 9 年前
Anyone want to buy my Makerbot Replicator 2X?
评论 #11606162 未加载