TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Battery Research with an Open Science Community, Does It Exist?

4 点作者 alex_hirner大约 9 年前
Increased energy density while cutting marginal costs is a hard problem with significant payoffs. Breakthroughs would unlock new business models and welfare effects from robotics, transportation, disaster relief and feasibility of carbon neutral energy production. However, research in this domain with but a few examples [1] is characterized by proprietary R&amp;D.<p>On the contrary, we&#x27;ve seen great collective achievements over the last years in a variety of fields:<p><pre><code> - gitxiv.org, arxiv.org: Various CS subdomains, math, physics - gym.openai.org: Reinforcement learning - www.fold.it: Protein modelling </code></pre> The list goes on and is accompanied by controversial but factual initiatives towards public research becoming free as in FOSS [2]. According to Franzoni &amp; Sauermann (2014) [3], the main criteria for effective open science communities are:<p><pre><code> - sharing of intermediate results - openness to participation </code></pre> The ideal platform would thus be effective in breaking down problems to crowd-scientists and enable attribution of teams and individuals (better than on a subreddit). This post is both a question and proposal towards evangelists who would like to join such a project.<p>Are there any open online communities for battery research? If not, what are communities closest to the domain and potentially receptive? Which journals publish work that is ahead or on par with closed R&amp;D?<p><pre><code> [1] Tesla&#x27;s stance on the use of its patents [2] sci-hub [3] Franzoni, C., &amp; Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. doi:10.1016&#x2F;j.respol.2013.07.005</code></pre>

暂无评论

暂无评论