TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why the Media Fixation on “Transit Is Failing” Stories?

67 点作者 another大约 9 年前

13 条评论

kazinator大约 9 年前
People love to hate public transit, and will click on any headline that promises to fuel their sentiment.<p>In particular, people who commute using single-occupancy vehicles are happy to read anything which externalizes and validates their views about the viability of transit.
评论 #11655521 未加载
评论 #11655267 未加载
评论 #11655391 未加载
评论 #11655389 未加载
barney54大约 9 年前
I think the reason has to do with the perception that ridership should be rapidly increasing and it isn&#x27;t. Population is up, urbanization, is up, but public transit isn&#x27;t keeping pace. That&#x27;s an interesting story because it is non-obvious. I don&#x27;t think there much else to the media fixation than that.
评论 #11655141 未加载
评论 #11655847 未加载
massysett大约 9 年前
In Washington DC it has taken over ten years of crashes, worker and passenger fatalities, and awful service for the press to start telling &quot;Metro is failing&quot; stories. Up until then the stories generally were positive.
评论 #11655043 未加载
评论 #11655017 未加载
评论 #11655170 未加载
rchowe大约 9 年前
Public transit is a very visible part of government for people who live in cities that have it, and it&#x27;s controversial because it&#x27;s partially financed with taxpayer money whether you use it or not.<p>I feel like especially in southern California, there are a lot of people in the suburbs who don&#x27;t use public transit and who feel like the money spent on transit (&quot;moving poor people around&quot;) should go to road projects instead which benefit them.<p>I was recently in Miami, and my friend who lives there said to use Lyft instead of taking the bus or the metro, because &quot;it&#x27;s only used by poor people&quot;. I compare this to Boston, where people complain about MBTA crowds and management, but in general if you&#x27;re near a subway stop you&#x27;ll take the subway over Uber of Lyft (when it&#x27;s running).
评论 #11655048 未加载
评论 #11655029 未加载
评论 #11655040 未加载
评论 #11655024 未加载
cptskippy大约 9 年前
Is it just me or does the type of chart used only make it harder to interpret things?<p>Why not plot actual numbers for population and ridership on a chart instead of % change relative to 2001? It seems deceptive.
strommen大约 9 年前
Maybe I need to take off my tin-foil hat - but I think this reads exactly as if somebody paid the newspaper to write a story about the &quot;failure of mass transit&quot;, and the writers&#x2F;editors snuck in this graph as a hidden message.
评论 #11655733 未加载
mc32大约 9 年前
It may have to do with for example, the VTA expanding service (in miles of track) but the ridership not going up to match. Also, rail in places like the bay area, or even buses, just can&#x27;t justify the opex given the relatively light ridership. Mass transit is rarely profitable (financially self sustaining) but many transit systems, given housing density and commercial&#x2F;residential patterns, in the US, are woefully in deficits.<p>Edit: To add, I mean this in terms of more than just the high density corridors and terminus to terminus lines. I mean if you live in Almaden Valley and want to get to East San Jose or you want to get to Milpitas. Or if you want to get from The Marina in SF to the Outer Sunset. Most SF transit is designed to pull people in and out of the old downtown core (even MUNI uses the terms &quot;inbound&quot; and outbound&quot; which tell you a lot about the passenger flow they had in mind. There is no &quot;ring&quot; line or N-S LRVs in SF.
评论 #11655295 未加载
评论 #11655645 未加载
Scoundreller大约 9 年前
I&#x27;m hoping the failure of transit leads into a 32-hour&#x2F;4-day work week media fixation... Overnight 20% reduction in load = dramatically faster service and reduced congestion.
评论 #11655298 未加载
fucking_tragedy大约 9 年前
It plays into the &quot;ridesharing is the future&quot; narrative that pulls in the big bucks.
评论 #11655581 未加载
gaur大约 9 年前
Reminds me of Paul Graham&#x27;s article about newspapers shilling for suit companies: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulgraham.com&#x2F;submarine.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulgraham.com&#x2F;submarine.html</a>
throwaway_exer大约 9 年前
As a long-time rider, the VTA infrastructure is excellent, and the route coverage is good. It even has wifi.<p>In the short-term, if buses left and arrived on time, that would be a helpful improvement. Longer-term, ride analysis from Clipper data could optimize routes and frequencies.<p>When looking at farebox recovery numbers, remember that the bloated bureaucracy, driver salaries and pensions have to be paid from that.<p>Doubling the speed of the light rail would make it much more usable.
enraged_camel大约 9 年前
I have zero evidence of this, but having witnessed Uber and Lyft spending over $8 million dollars trying to pass pro-ridesharing legislation here in Austin (which failed, thankfully), I can&#x27;t help but wonder if these types of &quot;Transit is Failing&quot; stories might be their astroturfers&#x2F;PR agencies at work.<p>Think about it: as a ridesharing company, the more you convince people that public transit is in bad shape and getting worse everyday, the more they will clamor for your ridesharing service.
评论 #11654998 未加载
评论 #11655003 未加载
orasis大约 9 年前
This is California specific. Don&#x27;t bother reading if you thought the title was about larger scale trends.
评论 #11655060 未加载
评论 #11655428 未加载
评论 #11655108 未加载
评论 #11655103 未加载