TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Tutorial On Designing/Building A PCB (Using FOSS)

160 点作者 ChrisGammell大约 9 年前

14 条评论

kirrent大约 9 年前
For those interested in the teaching philosophy behind contextual electronics you might be interested in this video - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=5_9Q4DoUlT8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=5_9Q4DoUlT8</a><p>He favours diving into a teaching example where the student has little background knowledge and expanding later. While my interests are more in the fundamentals I can appreciate the motivation behind this approach, especially in an online environment where keeping your students engaged is key.
评论 #11671472 未加载
billylindeman大约 9 年前
For those interested in pcb design and you&#x27;re not tied to FOSS I&#x27;d definitely recommend trying upverter.com. It&#x27;s made loads of progress in the last few years and is probably the best &#x2F; easiest to use layout software for beginners that I&#x27;ve come across.<p>I&#x27;ve worked with eagle, altium, and briefly KiCad but I can never get over the tediousness of using KiCad. I recently checked out upverter and after watching their tutorial was able to design an LCD adapter board from start to finish in ~2 hours.<p>Not trying to knock too hard on KiCad because it&#x27;s great that we have an FOSS option, but if you&#x27;re just into tinkering, upverter definitely has an easier learning curve and is pretty powerful. I always find that I want to spend my tinkering time actually getting my project designed instead of fighting with tooling.
评论 #11672542 未加载
评论 #11672015 未加载
评论 #11671760 未加载
评论 #11687590 未加载
评论 #11674167 未加载
gbugniot大约 9 年前
I guess KiCad is a good future proof solution for FOSS PCB design.<p>KiCad is now used intensively by CERN teams, and backup by them too. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ohwr.org&#x2F;projects&#x2F;cern-kicad&#x2F;wiki" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ohwr.org&#x2F;projects&#x2F;cern-kicad&#x2F;wiki</a><p>See the KiCad CERN roadmap (10. is about UI): <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ohwr.org&#x2F;projects&#x2F;cern-kicad&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;WorkPackages" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ohwr.org&#x2F;projects&#x2F;cern-kicad&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;WorkPackages</a>
wyager大约 9 年前
Having used Eagle, KiCAD, and several others, my current favorite is Fritzing. It&#x27;s quite easy to use and has a large library of built-in parts. Creating new parts is pretty easy compared to other software I&#x27;ve used. Performance leaves a bit to be desired, but this doesn&#x27;t become a problem except for pretty large circuits.
评论 #11671995 未加载
评论 #11672076 未加载
zintagon大约 9 年前
Fun project!<p>I watched the Building Blinky video.<p>You could improve the video if you hold a loupe in front of the camera lens when trying to zoom in for fine detail, like when you were trying to show us a bridge on two pins.
评论 #11671455 未加载
beardicus大约 9 年前
Hi Chris! Nice job with the tutorial and podcast. I haven&#x27;t designed a board in a while, but next time I do I&#x27;ll definitely be putting in some time moving from Eagle to KiCad.
评论 #11671774 未加载
评论 #11671463 未加载
svens_大约 9 年前
Very nice introduction to KiCad - also for people with a background in other CAD tools like me.<p>It&#x27;s awesome to have a short but complete example of the whole process. KiCad definitely has some room to improve in terms of UI&#x2F;UX flow, so that was very helpful.
znpy大约 9 年前
This is interesting to me because recently I have been playing with the open source spice software, ng-spice, and all of the other tools.<p>I&#x27;ll make sure to watch the whole series tomorrow morning :)
throwaway7767大约 9 年前
I&#x27;d love to hear from someone familiar with both KiCad and eagle how the library availability compares. Last time I tried the FOSS alternatives, the main pain point was that I needed to create pretty much all the component libraries myself, whereas for eagle someone had usually already done that work.<p>Eagle is a truly terrific program, but I would really like a FOSS alternative. I&#x27;ll have to give KiCad a try next time I have to do some layout work.
dbcurtis大约 9 年前
Just adding a note here that gEDA, the GNU EDA suite, is another free software alternative. Its older than KiCAD by quite a bit. I got started with gEDA since I was doing PCB&#x27;s before KiCAD, and now have invested in tools and libraries and such and don&#x27;t want to restart. The functionality seems roughly equivalent -- both have their rough edges, just in different places.
评论 #11672413 未加载
aceperry大约 9 年前
Another free CAD program for pcb making is designspark pcb (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rs-online.com&#x2F;designspark&#x2F;electronics&#x2F;eng&#x2F;page&#x2F;designspark-pcb-home-page" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rs-online.com&#x2F;designspark&#x2F;electronics&#x2F;eng&#x2F;page&#x2F;de...</a>). It&#x27;s not opensource like Kicad and gEDA, and it&#x27;s only available on Windows. But it&#x27;s easy to learn, very polished for free software, and quite capable. Lots of tutorials as well. There is a lot of free software available for hobbyists&#x2F;makers today and they&#x27;re pretty impressive compared to commercial software.
srean大约 9 年前
Sincere call for comments on make a living as a PCB designer in India.
评论 #11673793 未加载
评论 #11676227 未加载
callesgg大约 9 年前
Watched the hole series more or less, feel a bit suckerd when the device did not even work.<p>Put your wrists on something when you solder.<p>Long time Amphour listener.
zakhomuth大约 9 年前
Great work Chris! Looks awesome.