TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Lifting a Million Pounds of Stainless Steel

82 点作者 state_machine将近 9 年前

7 条评论

cmsmith将近 9 年前
I work at NIST and took a tour of this machine a few months ago. A few bonus facts:<p>- The spatial distribution of the local gravity field is a significant part of the uncertainty of these measurements. The weights extend into the basement of the lab, and the gravity in the basement is less than that above the surface. They produce gravity maps by dropping things in a vacuum to get a handle on it.<p>- The drift in the dead weight standard was mostly caused by the individual masses welding themselves together under the immense pressure of the weight stack. The interface has been designed to reduce this effect.<p>- The same group is also working to count the number of atoms in the kilogram, so that the mass of the dead weight stack will not be 500,000 times the mass of a piece of platinum in Paris, but will be 500,000 times the mass of 6.XX E23 silicon atoms.
评论 #11775702 未加载
评论 #11776553 未加载
评论 #11775461 未加载
评论 #11776616 未加载
评论 #11775980 未加载
评论 #11779048 未加载
teh_klev将近 9 年前
There&#x27;s some reasonable sized photo&#x27;s of this monster here:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nist.gov&#x2F;pml&#x2F;div684&#x2F;grp07&#x2F;million-pound-deadweight-restoration-continues-06262015.cfm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nist.gov&#x2F;pml&#x2F;div684&#x2F;grp07&#x2F;million-pound-deadweigh...</a>
Tim61将近 9 年前
This would sound much less impressive if they just said 500 tons. Also, why the dead weight? 500 tons is easily doable with a (smallish) hydraulic press.<p>The actual title of the article is &quot;How Do You Lift A Million Pounds Of Stainless Steel?&quot; I feel like they didn&#x27;t answer that question either. It turns out that the weights are in fact lifted by hydraulics.
评论 #11774753 未加载
评论 #11775047 未加载
评论 #11775132 未加载
评论 #11774687 未加载
gadders将近 9 年前
Now they just need to try folding some paper 7 times, squash some playdoh animals and set up a YouTube channel and the thing will pay for itself:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11694819" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11694819</a>
jaseemabid将近 9 年前
Why they don&#x27;t use SI <i>even</i> for scientific measurements?
评论 #11776663 未加载
评论 #11776676 未加载
评论 #11779000 未加载
dsfyu404ed将近 9 年前
Did they put the tools back in the cabinet when they were done?<p>That&#x27;s a serious question.
yuubi将近 9 年前
&gt; why the dead weight?<p>I assume it&#x27;s because masses are more stable and easier to calibrate than the gauge on a hydraulic press.