TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Scientist Engineers Bacterium That Inhales CO2, Produces Energy

199 点作者 miraji将近 9 年前

20 条评论

Turing_Machine将近 9 年前
The headline, while accurate, doesn&#x27;t really describe the breakthrough here.<p>In itself, it&#x27;s not surprising that sunlight, hydrogen from water and CO2 could be put together to make biomass. That&#x27;s pretty much what plants (and many natural bacteria) do already.<p>The novel aspect of these bacteria is that they apparently do the job 10x more efficiently than natural organisms.
评论 #11801749 未加载
fabian2k将近 9 年前
The headline is seriously misleading, the energy comes from sunlight which is used to split water into hydrogen. And the bacteria use the hydrogen as an energy source to create biomass from CO2. That biomass is mostly in burnable fuel.<p>The article is very interesting, but the headline makes it sound like a fundamental misunderstanding of thermodynamics.
评论 #11804109 未加载
smaili将近 9 年前
FWIW,<p><i>“This isn’t solving your CO2 problem,” he said. ”I’m taking CO2 out of the air, you burn it and you put the CO2 back. So it’s carbon neutral. I’m not going to reverse 400 ppm of CO2. But you’re not going to use any more stuff out of the ground.”</i>
评论 #11802141 未加载
评论 #11801561 未加载
goda90将近 9 年前
&quot;The leaf hasn’t lived up to its promise, Nocera said, because the world isn’t ready for hydrogen fuel.&quot;<p>And probably won&#x27;t be for transportation because battery tech is improving. But if this proves to be an effective way to produce liquid biofuel that can replace gasoline&#x2F;diesel with simple engine conversions, then we can repurpose our existing liquid fuel infrastructure and existing cars instead of building a whole new hydrogen based system.
评论 #11801584 未加载
评论 #11801618 未加载
评论 #11804014 未加载
johngalt将近 9 年前
My brilliant invention: A solar powered self replicating machine that eats CO2 and uses it to create building material. With minimal preparation the material could also be burned for energy.<p>I wonder how far I&#x27;d get before people realized I was planting trees.
评论 #11803803 未加载
riprowan将近 9 年前
My guess is that the chief obstacle will be political: this has the potential to hit the most powerful people in the world directly in the pocketbook<p>He&#x27;s probably going to India probably because there is more political will there to allow this thing to continue.
shaqbert将近 9 年前
Any mechanism to capture CO2 emissions is a huge win for the environment.<p>What is missing is an assessment of cost. If this is economically feasible at some point in time in the future, then goodbye oil and coal.<p>Open question is how to ensure these bio-engineered organisms don&#x27;t seep into the environment and trigger some unintended consequences. There needs to be some kill switch in there as well.
评论 #11801585 未加载
评论 #11801807 未加载
kbutler将近 9 年前
500L CO2 per day, to make 2kwh of electricity (per day)<p>That&#x27;s approximately as much CO2 as a person breathes out in a day (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Carbon_dioxide#Human_physiology" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Carbon_dioxide#Human_physiolog...</a> says about 1 kg, which works out to about 560L CO2 <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.umsl.edu&#x2F;~biofuels&#x2F;Energy%20Meter%20labs&#x2F;How%20much%20volume%20does%20a%20kg%20of%20CO2%20occupy.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.umsl.edu&#x2F;~biofuels&#x2F;Energy%20Meter%20labs&#x2F;How%20mu...</a>)<p>So yes, it provides a little bit of power, and no, it isn&#x27;t likely to scale up to planet-wide CO2 reductions - one per person on the planet just to cover the CO2 we breathe?
评论 #11802220 未加载
dTal将近 9 年前
It sure sounds promising, but it&#x27;d be good to see some more efficiency numbers. All there is in the article is this:<p>&quot;A one-liter reactor full of Nocera’s bacteria can capture 500 liters of atmospheric CO2 per day, he said. For every kilowatt hour of energy they produce, they’ll remove 237 liters of CO2 from the air.&quot;<p>By my reckoning that works out to about 80 watts, continuous. Solar irradiance is roughly a kilowatt per square meter, so to get 80 watts at 10% efficiency you need nearly a square meter, which leaves your 1-liter reactor stretched to a millimeter thick. Hard to imagine a 1mm thick mat of bacteria absorbing 10% of the light.<p>The limiting factor really is area, not volume. By that metric, solar panels are still twice as efficient. Still, it would be good to have solar panels that grow themselves!
评论 #11813322 未加载
xfactor973将近 9 年前
If you burn the alcohol and bury the biomass then you&#x27;re carbon negative. This needs to get put into production immediately!
thereisnospork将近 9 年前
I wonder how much of the efficiency increase comes from simply bypassing photosynthesis (e.g. what is the thermodynamic efficiency of yeast for glucose -&gt; ethanol)?<p>In any case there are a few important questions re feasibility. Do these bacteria work at atmospheric partial pressures of CO2? Do they perform at the advertised rate at the ~0.0015g&#x2F;L of hydrogen you&#x27;d be lucky to get in solution from his leaf?<p>Nocera is a blow hard, so pending the full paper I expect the answers aren&#x27;t encouraging.
JustUhThought将近 9 年前
Yay. Now we don&#x27;t need plants to reduce the greenhouse gas CO2. We just need to turn loose this bacterium and build an economy around alcohol fuels. No need for systems thinking that involves the environment when we can create a bacterium which is more efficient in one aspect of the environment it is replacing. So long as we can extend this reductionist framework to provide us with the nitrogen we need. And the global temperature management functions. And the human food. And the....etc
评论 #11801733 未加载
评论 #11802653 未加载
评论 #11802602 未加载
abhi3将近 9 年前
&gt;But if hydrogen from the leaf can combine with CO2 to make alcohol fuel, the fuel can be used the way diesel is now.<p>Hmmmm....so bacteria breathes in CO2 to make fuel....so we can burn the fuel and release the CO2 back in the atmosphere?<p>Not to take away anything from this impressive scientific achievement but this application is just depressing.
评论 #11801947 未加载
评论 #11802297 未加载
评论 #11801875 未加载
评论 #11802148 未加载
tener将近 9 年前
Very cool, except first you need to get the hydrogen. For that I believe he is planning to use the &quot;artificial leaf&quot; he has invented previously.<p>Problem is, while the bacteria can reproduce on their own, the leafs won&#x27;t. They are made from silicon so probably similar tech to regular solar cells. This can be likely a limiting factor here.<p>Still interesting news.
gumby将近 9 年前
I can&#x27;t open the forbes page; how does this compare to Nate Lewis&#x27; work at cal tech (which is a mechanical alternative): <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nsl.caltech.edu&#x2F;research" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nsl.caltech.edu&#x2F;research</a>
DateK将近 9 年前
&gt; the leaf can make hydrogen from any water—dirty water, even urine<p>I wonder how they tackle the problem of monoculture.<p>The issue with biofuel from algae is that once the container is contaminated with fungae, it reqires expensive draining and bleaching.
andrewvijay将近 9 年前
Everyday I think of the suffocating levels of pollution here in India while I commute. This is a fantastic news for us since they are planning to bring it up here first !
ommunist将近 9 年前
Carbon-neutral bioreactors. Very interesting and extremely useful research. Who shall own that DNA strain and control dissemination of technology?
smt88将近 9 年前
This announcement is about a year old. I&#x27;m not sure why Forbes is covering it like it&#x27;s news.
评论 #11802056 未加载
SCHiM将近 9 年前
Does this mean our problems with CO2 buildup are partialy solved? Or solved to any large extent?