TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Largest Infrastructure Project in History: Chinese High-Speed Rail to Europe

68 点作者 limist大约 15 年前

12 条评论

jacquesm大约 15 年前
Once it's done I'll travel that thing, what a unique perspective on the world it must be to see the landscape and the culture change like that.<p>It's a perspective that no airplane ride will ever give you.
评论 #1191806 未加载
评论 #1192455 未加载
portman大约 15 年前
The largest PROPOSED infrastructure project in history would be the Transatlantic Tunnel.<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transatlantic_tunnel" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transatlantic_tunnel</a><p><a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-04/trans-atlantic-maglev" rel="nofollow">http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-04/trans-atlantic...</a>
评论 #1191970 未加载
评论 #1191968 未加载
CapitalistCartr大约 15 年前
This is not a big deal as an engineering project. It's a lot of expensive track-laying, but the obstacles are not as bad as some already conquered elsewhere.<p>Politically, it's basically impossible.
评论 #1191756 未加载
limist大约 15 年前
Wow, didn't expect such interest from HN. Seems everyone loves trains. :)<p>Tangentially, what is it about trains anyway? Seems to me they hit the natural sweet-spot of "comprehensible speed" or speed at a near-human scale: not so fast and distant as to be alien like jets, but fast enough to be interesting. Oh, and stress-free compared to driving.
评论 #1191910 未加载
评论 #1192428 未加载
评论 #1192437 未加载
fbu大约 15 年前
Any map so far ? They have to go through Iran, Russia or a myriad of ex-ussr countries, I can't see how that's gonna work out ...
评论 #1191794 未加载
评论 #1191782 未加载
评论 #1192557 未加载
drats大约 15 年前
"Its main connection to Europe would likely go through India, Pakistan and the Middle East. Although, exact routes are not yet determined."<p>Can anyone say "IED derailment at 200kph+"?
评论 #1191763 未加载
thingie大约 15 年前
Hm, this doesn't really seems to be an attempt to divert passenger traffic from using the planes to some cross-continental HSR. On the other hand, it'd allow China to export much much more goods and much much faster than nowadays with ships [1]. And of course, it would also very much strengthen China's influence in the Middle east and around, as in this area, HSR travel times would be very interesting and provide (in comparison) wonderful connection with China.<p>You wouldn't travel from China to Europe by train even with this, of course. I wonder what would the Russian response be, as they are quite expected to maintain their strong influence in this region, and this isn't exactly going to support that.<p>[1] This is already being done, in a rather small scale.
sman大约 15 年前
Hard to make it happen politically. India tried something similar, to get gas from Iran in a pipeline. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Pakistan%E2%80%93India_gas_pipeline" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Pakistan%E2%80%93I...</a> The project has been gestating for the last 20 years with no real movement in the progress meter. And similar to what happened with the pipeline, I expect the US to spring roadblocks all over the place. Even if it cannot convince every country, it will convince enough to ensure gaps in the rail line undermining its usefulness.
评论 #1191893 未加载
zol大约 15 年前
With China's minimum wage being around US 60c an hour (<a href="http://bit.ly/6mDBYz" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6mDBYz</a>) they are in a much better position to undertake such a labour intensive job as the West.<p>It is a smart move to receive payment in the form of natural resources as some of the countries involved in the network are economically poor but resource rich. It is likely the countries participating will end up paying a lot more in resources than they would have in cash.<p>It's my opinion that people are mistaken when viewing the proposal in terms of personal transport. It's not. It's a system designed to fuel China's growing demand for resources, which cannot be transported via air. In the other direction will come a high speed flow of manufactured goods.
评论 #1192419 未加载
ojbyrne大约 15 年前
A trans-North America high speed rail route would be pretty cool. This seems analogous to the way sputnik ignited the space race.
评论 #1191844 未加载
评论 #1191837 未加载
martythemaniak大约 15 年前
With all the flack airlines and air transport is getting now because of climate change, maybe China can try and sell this is action on that front? Trains are more efficient than airplanes, are they not? (not a rhetorical question)<p>Even so, I doubt this will happen in 10 years.
danw大约 15 年前
Any mention of what the route would be? And what's the anticipated travel time from London to China?
评论 #1191881 未加载
评论 #1191877 未加载