TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

“@ubuntu asks us to bill you 1e-2e per month for each VPS/PCI/PCC/SD”

155 点作者 Nyr将近 9 年前

23 条评论

rgbrenner将近 9 年前
Several people have pointed out that OVH modifies Ubuntu (w&#x2F; a custom kernel to support their hardware).<p>If that&#x27;s true, they shouldn&#x27;t be surprised Ubuntu wants a license fee... it says so in their trademark policy:<p><i>- You can make changes to Ubuntu for your own personal use or for your organisation’s own internal use.</i><p><i>- You can redistribute Ubuntu, but only where there has been no modification to it.</i><p><i>- Any redistribution of modified versions of Ubuntu must be approved, certified or provided by Canonical if you are going to associate it with the Trademarks. Otherwise you must remove and replace the Trademarks and will need to recompile the source code to create your own binaries. This does not affect your rights under any open source licence applicable to any of the components of Ubuntu. If you need us to approve, certify or provide modified versions for redistribution you will require a licence agreement from Canonical, for which you may be required to pay.</i><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ubuntu.com&#x2F;legal&#x2F;terms-and-policies&#x2F;intellectual-property-policy" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ubuntu.com&#x2F;legal&#x2F;terms-and-policies&#x2F;intellectual-...</a>
评论 #11934948 未加载
评论 #11935226 未加载
评论 #11935098 未加载
评论 #11937178 未加载
评论 #11936710 未加载
评论 #11939961 未加载
评论 #11935512 未加载
评论 #11935116 未加载
comice将近 9 年前
A rather vague claim, needs more details. Canonical allow the use of the Ubuntu trademark to describe unmodified versions of Ubuntu (in this case, I&#x27;d guess it&#x27;s their cloud server images)<p>If you modify the images, you can still redistribute them, you just can&#x27;t call it Ubuntu.<p>This has some problems, some of which Matthew Garrett has explored in more details.<p>But generally, imo, it&#x27;s a useful tool to prevent clueless vps&#x2F;cloud providers modifying Ubuntu images and breaking them and tarnishing the Ubuntu name (which has happened repeatedly, usually breaking security).
dsr_将近 9 年前
Perhaps European trademark laws are different from the US -- but here, using a trademark to refer directly to the thing which is the subject of the trademark is always a legal use.<p>That&#x27;s why the Pepsi Challenge can name Coca-Cola directly as the product that people prefer. Certainly Coca-Cola would sue them if they had any legal grounds to stand on, and they do not.<p>Is OVH using &quot;Ubuntu&quot; to refer to something other than an Ubuntu-sourced distro that they are making available on their servers? Are they substituting an OVH-tweaked derivative and calling it Ubuntu? If so, then Canonical has a plausible case. If not, it&#x27;s an overanxious, overpaid and undereducated lawyer&#x27;s assistant writing letters by the hour.
评论 #11934793 未加载
评论 #11935123 未加载
评论 #11934735 未加载
评论 #11936425 未加载
评论 #11934752 未加载
评论 #11934727 未加载
vrutkovs将近 9 年前
It seems the already charge Dreamhost: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;cleverdevil&#x2F;status&#x2F;744622945096503297" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;cleverdevil&#x2F;status&#x2F;744622945096503297</a>
grizzles将近 9 年前
Sounds like a good open source business model to me. If OVH were distributing it exactly the way UbuntuCo was distributing it, eg. as an ISO on a http&#x2F;ftp site then I don&#x27;t think UbuntuCo would have the legal footing to do this. But by acting as a VAR hosting provider, with provisioning guis, etc. then OVH have changed the product, and can no longer be a free rider.<p>Since it&#x27;s not exactly Ubuntu anymore, it stands to reason that hosting companies should pay to license the trademark Ubuntu or rebrand it like the CentOS guys did.
评论 #11935469 未加载
nmstoker将近 9 年前
Might it be better to hear Canonical&#x27;s position before we all leap into how awful this is? Is there any particular policy they&#x27;re on record as applying here?
hartator将近 9 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;Hartator&#x2F;status&#x2F;744662021598175233" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;Hartator&#x2F;status&#x2F;74466202159817523...</a><p>Asked if removing the option to have the ovh modified version of Ubuntu will be enough. I always have random bugs when I was using it anyway. And it&#x27;s pretty hard to debug.
alrs将近 9 年前
This will be great news for Debian. Thank you, Canonical.
评论 #11935689 未加载
评论 #11934704 未加载
tamana将近 9 年前
Mozilla doesn&#x27;t let people distribute modified copies of &quot;Firefox&quot; either. That&#x27;s why Iceweasel was invented.
评论 #11935125 未加载
tacone将近 9 年前
Just remove the trademark and name it &quot;Debian derivative&quot;. Make sure to link the name to the official website so people can understand. This will lower Ubuntu usage a lot, still people will be able to install it if they wish.
vacri将近 9 年前
Ubuntu: €1-2&#x2F;month from tweet<p>RHEL: £19.99&#x2F;month (€25.64) from OVH UK page<p>People don&#x27;t seem to complain that RHEL asks for money.
评论 #11936104 未加载
mirimir将近 9 年前
I kept rereading &quot;1e-2e per month&quot; in the title, trying to see it as &quot;1e-2 EUR per month&quot;, because 1 EUR per month is just implausible for VPS.
评论 #11934691 未加载
smartbit将近 9 年前
Perhaps unrelated, a year ago at an Ubuntu event I understood from a Canonical salesperson that they asks a kickback from providers when they advertise with Ubuntu. In London Canonical has an EMEA sales team dedicated to negotiating these kickbacks.<p>In my understanding this business model emerged after the Cloud providers needed patches very fast after Heartbleed [0]. In return for the kickback, Canonical offers fast patches and Hosters&#x2F;Cloud providers can use the Ubuntu logo.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.openssl.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;secadv&#x2F;20140407.txt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.openssl.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;secadv&#x2F;20140407.txt</a>
inputjoker将近 9 年前
I am hoping this to have a negative impact on ubuntu by removing ubuntu from as many cloud services as possible. We have better alternatives, but due to large number of community solutions makes ubuntu the common choice.
评论 #11934562 未加载
评论 #11934647 未加载
Nyr将近 9 年前
Not the first time which Canonical attempts to abuse their trademark...<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;information-technology&#x2F;2013&#x2F;11&#x2F;canonical-abused-trademark-law-to-target-a-site-critical-of-ubuntu-privacy&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;information-technology&#x2F;2013&#x2F;11&#x2F;canoni...</a>
userbinator将近 9 年前
Call it OVHbuntu and be done with it.
评论 #11935458 未加载
Shorel将近 9 年前
I would prefer that OVH shipped Ubuntu with the right kernel instead of the very outdated one they use.<p>In that case, they don&#x27;t need to pay Canonical anything, and the OVH users would have a better OS to install.
davb将近 9 年前
How do various open source licences treat naming rights for derivative works?
评论 #11935185 未加载
clopez将近 9 年前
&quot;&quot;&quot; They do the same to us at @DreamHost and I’ve always felt it was inappropriate. &quot;&quot;&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;cleverdevil&#x2F;status&#x2F;744622945096503297" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;cleverdevil&#x2F;status&#x2F;744622945096503297</a>
评论 #11935065 未加载
andmarios将近 9 年前
Maybe they could switch to Mandriva Linux. :-k
pmontra将近 9 年前
@OVH don&#x27;t pay. I for sure won&#x27;t pay you the extra, I&#x27;ll switch to another distro. Furthermore I&#x27;ll prove in a court the legality of their claim.
评论 #11936697 未加载
mark_l_watson将近 9 年前
I don&#x27;t understand this. AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure all list Ubuntu as a VPS OS option.<p>I run Ubuntu on all three of my Linux laptops and usually on leased servers and VPSs, and I support them with donations, but if this tweet from OVH is legitimate, then someone at Conanical needs to do some back peddling on this.
chmike将近 9 年前
Ubuntu doesn&#x27;t support remote desktop beside ssh. There is really no benefit in using Ubuntu as remote server compared to Debian. I would advise to drop support of Ubuntu. Î&#x27;m at OVH and use Debian. I´m so far happy with that. Îm switching from Ubuntu to Debian because of the remote display problem. I can&#x27;t live without it.
评论 #11934795 未加载
评论 #11935962 未加载