TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Multi-Piece Shipment Support Available in the Shippo API

39 点作者 mikhaill将近 9 年前

4 条评论

numlocked将近 9 年前
I confess I don&#x27;t totally understand shippo; in the event that you are a business of the size where multiple-carrier headaches are coming into play, aren&#x27;t you also of the size where you need a proper order management, inventory management, and warehouse management system? And those systems tend to have address validation, shipping integration, label creation, etc. as built-in features. I don&#x27;t know why I&#x27;d roll my own versions of that stuff on top of their API layer.<p>It&#x27;s definitely a valuable API, but I&#x27;d be more likely to take advantage of it if I were a new SaaS company building logistics software -- Shippo would be a great shortcut to get to market with the aforementioned features. At that point I&#x27;d be capturing more value in the form of my LoB software than Shippo could ever capture in their (essentially) cost+ pricing model.<p>I don&#x27;t get it -- but I feel like that&#x27;s my fault and I&#x27;m missing the market, so maybe someone can enlighten me.<p>Edit: Also this was an interesting read and clever solution to a tricky migration problem!
评论 #12090221 未加载
charlesz将近 9 年前
This is really great for Shippo, and an issue that I&#x27;ve commented on before[0]. It&#x27;s a pretty obvious feature to have missed in the first place, but taking on the insane complexities of UPS, FedEx, and USPS is a never-ending up-hill battle (I&#x27;ve done it.)<p>I&#x27;m still longing for the day that Shippo is fully fleshed out so I can offload that massive infrastructure headache off to someone else.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11871297" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11871297</a>
chrissnell将近 9 年前
What&#x27;s the value proposition here, besides multiple carrier availability? I was able to create multi-piece shipment labels with the FedEx API in 1999. The API was stupid-simple and easily implemented in Perl back then. Are you offering volume discounts even when that volume is split amongst a host of carriers? I never saw the point in using multiple vendors as a small-&#x2F;medium-sized shipper. It was easier to stick with one and have only one set of shipper-provided supplies to worry about.
评论 #12089558 未加载
throwaway745234将近 9 年前
It seems to me that it would&#x27;ve been both easier and more logical to turn it into many-to-many, but I guess easier would&#x27;ve made the article less interesting.