Do people just knee-jerk react to stories here after reading the title only? The "self-case activism" she talks about is adding wikilinks, adding info she just researched, and expanding a Wikipedia article. The only political things she mentioned at all were her own interests in African Diaspora and LGBT topics which she contributes to in order to "help this world become a more equal place". It is extremely common for Wikipedia editors to contribute in their areas of interest; in fact there are WikiProjects set up specifically to facilitate that. [0] What she isn't doing is adding bias, but helping to address Wikipedia's systematic bias by adding to those areas. [1] Not going around injecting bias into articles as the comments here are saying. (And even that is valuable in itself because Wikipedia is meant to be written from a neutral point of view, which requires that articles "fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources" [2])<p>[0]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Directory" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Director...</a><p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Due_and_undue_weight" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_vie...</a>