TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Colourlovers (YC W10) Mixes With ColorSchemer And Adds To Twitter’s Palette

46 点作者 aepstein大约 15 年前

3 条评论

jacobolus大约 15 年前
I must admit, while the community aspect is neat, I find all these tools for creating color schemes (like “ColorSchemer”) pretty uninspiring. Every one I’ve seen has a pretty artificially inflexible interface, and most are based on device-oriented models of color, rather than anything based on (these days quite advanced) scientific understanding of human color perception; basically, they ignore most everything that color scientists have learned in the last century of research. Few seem to have any particularly insightful or interesting interface ideas either. Adobe’s Kuler is kind of neat, but it too fetishizes these nearly completely arbitrary (w/r/t perception) relations, in its definitions of various color scheme “types”.<p>Alas.
评论 #1211780 未加载
dariusmonsef大约 15 年前
If you'd like to see what happens when you mix Paul Graham and COLOURlovers... Check out: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dariusmonsef/4378029120/in/set-72157623358898141/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/dariusmonsef/4378029120/in/set-...</a>
评论 #1211692 未加载
andrewcooke大约 15 年前
how well does "the general public" get the idea that colour alone is worth thinking about? won't this suffer from being perceived as an "incomplete design place"? or is the idea that there's a niche for customizing sites (like twitter) where all you can really change are (css) colours and background images?