TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Judge Orders Yahoo to Explain How It Recovered ‘Deleted’ Emails in Drugs Case

103 点作者 alternize将近 9 年前

10 条评论

codemogul将近 9 年前
Relevant and coincidental personal anecdote: 10 years ago I caught my x-wife in an affair as she was using this same method the communicate with her lover. Her choice of email address for the shared account raised alarms on my firewall, so it was a simple matter to track to her machine. While she had gone to the similar trouble to delete all records on Yahoo (coincidentally), she had been browsing with IE which, due to some off-line setting, was cacheing locally all of the pages she had written. It was simply a matter of laying hands on her laptop and downloading all of that cache to expose the ruse.<p>I cannot find the article, but I believe this method of sharing access to one e-mail account to many parties was one of the comms methods employed by the 9&#x2F;11 terrorists, pioneered by Columbian drug lords.
评论 #12153514 未加载
评论 #12153922 未加载
评论 #12153964 未加载
评论 #12155159 未加载
评论 #12153548 未加载
评论 #12154727 未加载
评论 #12153810 未加载
评论 #12154209 未加载
pliny将近 9 年前
Here&#x27;s a thought: what if &#x27;Yahoo gives FBI snapshots&#x27; is actually parallel construction, but Yahoo are not allowed (under PATRIOT or whatever) to admit the extent of their cooperation with three letter agencies (for instance, that they hand over everything they see without requests being made). Do they have to refuse to comply with the court?
评论 #12153635 未加载
resoluteteeth将近 9 年前
The idea that Yahoo is covering for a government surveillance program is entertaining, but it hardly seems difficult to believe that they aren&#x27;t actually deleting what they say they are deleting. Of course, keeping copies of everything forever in violation of their own policy is not exactly going to make law enforcement unhappy.<p>I suspect that yahoo and other companies haven&#x27;t yet taken the issue of failing to delete data that should be deleted as seriously as that of losing data that shouldn&#x27;t be deleted, but this has the potential to become a significant privacy issue.
HarryHirsch将近 9 年前
Data retention is negotiated and spelled out in detail in NDAs for contract research organizations. It&#x27;s easy to delete data from servers once a project is done, but the backup tapes also have copies. You can&#x27;t throw the tapes out, because the company needs them, hence there are agreements what happens to the data and tapes, and nowadays these are standard practice.<p>This is a solved problem in the real world, but some companies would have us think it&#x27;s the Wild West, when in fact it isn&#x27;t.
评论 #12153509 未加载
评论 #12154566 未加载
falcolas将近 9 年前
I&#x27;m curious if there will be blowback on Internet email companies if it turns out the emails were not deleted, just archived away from user&#x27;s access.
评论 #12153460 未加载
评论 #12154852 未加载
评论 #12153475 未加载
IgorPartola将近 9 年前
Aren&#x27;t backups basically a guarantee that you can never ever delete anything from anyone&#x27;s server? Even if you hit delete on an email&#x2F;post&#x2F;photo&#x2F;etc. if they made a backup before then, your data will now forever live on in some vault or maybe just Amazon Glacier. I can&#x27;t imagine that Yahoo would go and retroactively remove your email from their backup tapes&#x2F;optical discs&#x2F;offline hard drives&#x2F;clay tablets that they use.
评论 #12154947 未加载
lox将近 9 年前
I could imagine drafts have much less diligent deletion policies vs sent emails. Auto-save mechanisms typically keep a long history of diffs, or whole versions.
catfood将近 9 年前
UPDATE email SET deleted = 1 WHERE uuid = &#x27;3b431dc020cc404b8bbea290e91b9865&#x27;;
geggam将近 9 年前
Farm model replicated across regions backed by filers taking snapshots of the entire farm.<p>* my speculation <i>
perseusprime11将近 9 年前
Is anything ever deleted?
评论 #12153730 未加载