TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Peter Thiel's Heroic Political Fantasies

46 点作者 listentojohan将近 9 年前

10 条评论

return0将近 9 年前
I get it, the author was very irritated that Thiel spoke for trump, so he wrote a really bad article full of personal attacks, misinformation, belittling comparisons etc. Why did the NYtimes publish this garbage ?
评论 #12158024 未加载
评论 #12158066 未加载
firasd将近 9 年前
I think the narrative in the article may be a bit of a stretch (Thiel is not against creating restaurants because he thinks they are worthless, he just says they aren&#x27;t profitable), but I think the conclusion is pretty much correct: the question that Thiel&#x27;s arguments raise revolve around the question of &quot;What Matters?&quot;<p>Personally when I listen to talks by Thiel or Musk I almost wonder, do I really need to drop everything and go build rockets? But to be honest, I find working on digital products pretty fulfilling. I think it&#x27;s a real craft. The deeper question of fulfilment then goes to what you&#x27;re building with that craft (I&#x27;ve found marketing campaigns are less fulfilling than user-facing products, for example), and then the even-deeper question goes to what you want to do with your life, and then there&#x27;s the yet-deeper question of how you want to interact with, and have your life experienced by, other people. At that point the question of whether you&#x27;re going from Zero-to-One (what Thiel calls technology) or One-to-Many (what he calls globalization) starts to recede in importance when making personal choices.
评论 #12158085 未加载
评论 #12158344 未加载
dhoe将近 9 年前
Trying to quote Nietzsche in German is not an advisable strategy if you don&#x27;t know German, dear hacks everywhere (&quot;das Mann&quot; does not exist).
评论 #12158271 未加载
auganov将近 9 年前
This very non-charitable reading of Zero to One makes it a hit piece. The reasoning is plausible and it&#x27;s well written. But anyone that&#x27;s in tech, has followed Peter and read the book knows it was never meant as a general philosophy&#x2F;political book. Though admittedly it has gotten so popular that a lot of people read it as such so perhaps there was no ill intention in the interpretation (tho the bathroom comment got interpreted rather maliciously).<p>Personally I think Peter talking at the RNC and [hopefully for me] exerting some kind of influence on Trump is the best thing to happen. I still see Trump as a blank slate. With his presidency [IMO] inevitable I think it&#x27;s super important that people like Peter start steering him in the right direction.
评论 #12158234 未加载
aorth将近 9 年前
I identify with &quot;liberal&quot; politics and parts of Thiel&#x27;s RNC speech resonated with me, but I&#x27;m wondering if those parts were lost on the RNC&#x27;s target demographic. For example: he says we should have gone to Mars instead of starting a war in Iraq (paraphrasing). I feel like the Republican demographic wouldn&#x27;t care about going to Mars, and not to mention a bunch of people got rich off the war (at tax payer&#x27;s expense of course).<p>Then there&#x27;s the part where he said the party shouldn&#x27;t focus on fake &quot;culture wars&quot; like which bathrooms transgender people use. How were those parts received by the RNC&#x27;s target audience?
评论 #12158002 未加载
评论 #12158446 未加载
nnq将近 9 年前
Don&#x27;t follow american politics that much, but hats off to Peter Thiel for having the courage to support Trump!<p>Even if a person seems horrible as a human being, if some of his&#x2F;her ideas make sense and align with your ideas, than <i>it&#x27;s OK to support them.</i> I happen to like Trump because he happens to think that America&#x27;s problems are internal and should be solved internally - no need to make any issue into a &quot;global issue&quot; and solve it through an international trade agreement or through a war <i>that affects everyone in the world</i> even if it&#x27;s not their f problem!
评论 #12157840 未加载
评论 #12158051 未加载
评论 #12157853 未加载
评论 #12158148 未加载
评论 #12157871 未加载
评论 #12157854 未加载
评论 #12158078 未加载
ZoF将近 9 年前
This is just a gutter hit-piece on Peter Thiel because he isn&#x27;t falling in line like the rest of SV.<p>There is zero actual substance here, the author takes a single anecdote from his book, interprets it to mean that Thiel thinks running a small business is not worthwhile and then proceeds to end with this:<p>-----------------------------------------<p>Silicon Valley, too, is of two minds. There are those who recognize that their uniquely innovative culture is a precipitate of a lot of expensive long-term institutional investment on the part of governments, universities and corporations, and that to function in a democracy you need to worry about stuff you personally don’t think is important. And there are those who believe only in charisma and prowess, the blinding insight and iron will that get you from zero to one.<p>-----------------------------------------<p>Silicon Valley isn&#x27;t of two minds, it is of many; and no, the uniquely innovative culture isn&#x27;t the sole result of expensive long-term institutional investment on the part of governments.
评论 #12158101 未加载
jpstory将近 9 年前
Somewhat related: Any ideas why NYT blocks my ability to &quot;Add to Read it Later&quot; on Safari for OS X? What motivations are there to do that (if they are doing it on purpose)?
评论 #12158312 未加载
ZoF将近 9 年前
It&#x27;s funny that the left attacks Trump for &#x27;fear-mongering&#x27; when their anti-Trump platform is &#x27;He&#x27;s literally Hitler!&#x27;
评论 #12161834 未加载
评论 #12158021 未加载
评论 #12157957 未加载
评论 #12157962 未加载
评论 #12158050 未加载
forgottenacc56将近 9 年前
Darth Thiel is one of the most frightening characters on the modern scene.... a man with virtually infinite resources and proven willingness to covertly carry out long term secret revenge plots against those he feels deserve it.<p>Princess Leia and Nick Denton would have had much in common.