TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Facebook Posts Strong Profit and Revenue Growth

171 点作者 kartD将近 9 年前

24 条评论

kilroy123将近 9 年前
It has been said many times, that something else will come around, become more popular, and overthrow facebook. I just don&#x27;t see that happening now.<p>They&#x27;re still doing well. They bought Instagram. (I think a very smart move.) They&#x27;ll eventually buy the next big thing.<p>I think Facebook is here to stay.
评论 #12176774 未加载
评论 #12177160 未加载
评论 #12177109 未加载
评论 #12177065 未加载
评论 #12177078 未加载
评论 #12178519 未加载
评论 #12177279 未加载
评论 #12176674 未加载
评论 #12177185 未加载
评论 #12176745 未加载
评论 #12177025 未加载
评论 #12177206 未加载
评论 #12177172 未加载
评论 #12178377 未加载
tedmiston将近 9 年前
Through clicking the &quot;web&quot; link it&#x27;s exciting to see Google AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) [0] has support for this article. The WSJ paywall does not seem to affect it.<p>The load time for me on average wifi was almost unnoticeable.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ampproject.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ampproject.org&#x2F;</a>
评论 #12176602 未加载
评论 #12179481 未加载
niftich将近 9 年前
Good for them. Lots of people spend lots of time on Facebook, so ads get a lot of eyeballs, making them valuable. But I wonder what their clickthrough-rate is. For some types of ads, that&#x27;s obviously not the point, but I doubt it&#x27;s very high.<p>At first, I was curious how their drive towards more video, both user- and professionally-produced, will mesh with their real name policy. But since they allow &#x27;pages&#x27; for public figures, businesses, content creators, and other more abstract entities, they may be able to strike a happy medium where content creators can broadcast under a well-known pseudonym, while content consumers are all real people with real identities, targetable with ads. With this setup, they can mount a true challenge against established video places like Youtube and Twitch.
评论 #12176519 未加载
评论 #12176523 未加载
评论 #12176588 未加载
评论 #12176516 未加载
fiveoak将近 9 年前
I&#x27;d be interested to know how much of that is from political spending during this crazy election year.
samfisher83将近 9 年前
I should have bought some facebook stock, but they are worth close to 400 billion dollars. Basically they are being forecasted to generate 20-30billion a year in cashflow at that valuation. I could see them maybe doing that, but its still a high valuation.
yueq将近 9 年前
We tried some display ads (non-app installation) on facebook. Since it&#x27;s CPM+CPC model, our CTR was extremely low and caused CPC very expensive.<p>I guess they have huge PV so overall performance is high. I wonder what the actual would ROI be for other publishers on FB.
评论 #12176685 未加载
encoderer将近 9 年前
Their huge ad scale provides a very flexible revenue machine. I think when FB misses a quarter it will be a big miss. Otherwise they can scale up ad units and make millions in incremental revenue if they need to pad a quarter.
adventured将近 9 年前
I still remember the very widespread arguments that were made before Facebook was heavily monetizing their platform&#x2F;s: that they would make more money by charging subscription fees.<p>That turns out to have been false. They&#x27;re getting $14.34 per year per user in the US, up ~50% over last year. There&#x27;s no scenario under which they could match that with a subscription service (most people would never be willing to pay).<p>They&#x27;re averaging $3.84 per user worldwide, up 38% over last year. You can&#x27;t go around raising subscription fees by 40% or 50% per year on most of the world, but you can optimize delivering them advertising. You can boost ad rates by 50% without harming the user experience one bit.<p>The ad approach won again, easily.In Facebook it&#x27;s going to end up producing another eventual $20+ billion annual profit money printing juggernaut ala Google. No subscription service in history has ever come close to accomplishing that sort of outcome, none ever will.
Animats将近 9 年前
From the article: <i>&quot;The most lucrative ads are app-install ads and news feed ads shown in Facebook’s mobile app.&quot;</i><p>Interesting. Neither of those is &quot;social&quot;.
dingaling将近 9 年前
Current estimate of the population of China is 1.37 billion, and India 1.26 billion.<p>So does that mean Facebook is now the largest affiliated group of human beings ever?
评论 #12176906 未加载
评论 #12176710 未加载
评论 #12176711 未加载
icc97将近 9 年前
Finally after about 10 years of using Facebook I was given a relevant ad last week.<p>Admittedly I cunningly lie about my age in Facebook and say I was born in 1918 (but on the correct day&#x2F;month for my half-friends who don&#x27;t know the actual date).
gigatexal将近 9 年前
I can&#x27;t remember the last time I clicked an ad on Facebook, but what I do click on are sponsored articles that showcase apps or products that I am interested in but not sidebar ads.
known将近 9 年前
&quot;Advertising on mobile devices accounted for 84% of Facebook’s $6.2 billion in advertising sales in the latest quarter&quot;<p>Proper Adblock on mobile devices will dilute their revenues :)
jgalt212将近 9 年前
FB makes 70% of its ad revenue from mobile. Can someone please explain to me the value prop of mobile ads? Doesn&#x27;t the small screen size put a lid on how much advertisers will bid for that space? After all, on web sites, the ad unit size correlates with CPM price.
评论 #12178389 未加载
评论 #12177752 未加载
vegardx将近 9 年前
It would be amazing if they at least started looking at what types of ads they are running. Some, if not even most, are completely against local regulation. The rest are outright actual scams or some multi-level marketing schemes.
facepalm将近 9 年前
So are people basically content, or do they still long for something more free?<p>Has the believe in something Diaspora-like evaporated completely since they screwed up?
roymurdock将近 9 年前
How long before Facebook acquires Twitter out of pity?
评论 #12177713 未加载
dschiptsov将近 9 年前
Which is a peak, because Facebook is neither new nor special even in the third world.
perseusprime11将近 9 年前
50 years from now, our kids wont remember Bill Gates or Steve Jobs, it will be Mark Zuckerburg sitting on a stage ready to release mosquitoes on to the audience.
ilostmykeys将近 9 年前
Facebook vs Death. OMG who&#x27;s gonna win!!!??
aresant将近 9 年前
EDIT - Whoops non-paywall didn&#x27;t pick up - click top result:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=Facebook+Posts+Strong+Profit+and+Revenue+Growth&amp;oq=Facebook+Posts+Strong+Profit+and+Revenue+Growth&amp;aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61j69i60j69i61j69i64&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8#q=Facebook+Posts+Strong+Profit+and+Revenue+Growth&amp;safe=active&amp;tbm=nws" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=Facebook+Posts+Strong+Profit...</a>
评论 #12176703 未加载
评论 #12176293 未加载
caminante将近 9 年前
non-paywall: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;on.wsj.com&#x2F;2ayjLKO" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;on.wsj.com&#x2F;2ayjLKO</a>
downandout将近 9 年前
Given the sheer volume of WSJ paywall links posted here, combined with the significance of YC, surely someone at YC could call someone at WSJ and get them to bypass the paywall when the referrer is HN. This is getting ridiculous. I&#x27;m familiar with the &quot;web&quot; link but even that gets old when every 4th or 5th link goes to WSJ.
评论 #12177393 未加载
评论 #12177345 未加载
mrweasel将近 9 年前
That&#x27;s slightly annoying. I strongly believed that Facebook would never be profitable. Guess I was wrong.
评论 #12176499 未加载
评论 #12176624 未加载