TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects charge for support/features/bugs?

5 点作者 bobbywilson0大约 15 年前
I see a lot of open source hackers getting jaded by the vampire-like community using their libraries for free and then complaining like a customer. I know that some libraries have a donation button, but most people won't donate. I feel like if these open-source developers would charge for priority support, or put "bounties" on feature requests and bugs, it would become more financially viable for them to work on their open-source projects.

3 条评论

Zev大约 15 年前
Brent Simmons (makes NetNewsWire for Mac and iPhone) made a very good post on this topic (well, charging for features, not related to open source specifically) awhile back: <a href="http://inessential.com/2009/07/16/dont_offer_50_for_your_favorite_feat" rel="nofollow">http://inessential.com/2009/07/16/dont_offer_50_for_your_fav...</a>. Its well worth reading (as are Daniel Jalkut's thoughts on the conversation, linked to from the blog post).<p>Basically, the points they make are that the motivator for most developers (on all projects, not just open source ones) is to make something good, with money being a side result of your efforts, but not the goal. Or, to paraphrase Daniel a bit, you want <i>freaking awesome</i> and not to simply be going through motions to pay off bills.
coryl大约 15 年前
So open source devs should offer premium support and paid options for better features...I think thats called running a business, right?
评论 #1222953 未加载
lsc大约 15 年前
many of the projects with less-technical users do just that. The guy who wrote the billing system i use, <a href="http://freeside.biz" rel="nofollow">http://freeside.biz</a> is a good example. He charges for features and if you want it installation and other support.