TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What No New Particles Means for Physics

189 点作者 ernesto95将近 9 年前

10 条评论

adrianratnapala将近 9 年前
Despite the more upbeat spin, I think the message from Arkani-Hamed is much the same as from Sabine Hossenfelder&#x27;s &quot;nightmare&quot; post (discussed at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12238197" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12238197</a>).<p>Both of them are saying its time to question pre-conceived notions of how to extend the Standard model. And I think both of them are excited about it.<p>Rightly so. People are unhappy about the Standard Model because it is insufficiently simple and symmetrical. But 20 orders of magnitude lie between our experiments and the Planck scale, there&#x27;s probably six levels of symmetry-braking, mess-making emergence between us and the real fundamentals.
评论 #12259708 未加载
评论 #12260767 未加载
whoByFire将近 9 年前
That final paragraph is great<p><i>Some theorists agree. Talk of disappointment is “crazy talk,” Arkani-Hamed said. “It’s actually nature! We’re learning the answer! These 6,000 people are busting their butts and you’re pouting like a little kid because you didn’t get the lollipop you wanted?”</i>
评论 #12259032 未加载
评论 #12260243 未加载
评论 #12259048 未加载
评论 #12259009 未加载
评论 #12260107 未加载
jomamaxx将近 9 年前
Imagine if you spent your whole life supporting some complex idea that is likely now to be BS. And you spread it.<p>I&#x27;m interested in the psychological aspects of identity.<p>I suggest a lot of them have not choice but to continue on believing their mythology. Their sense of self depends on it, and surely their funding does. And getting funding depends on strong sense of self.<p>Isn&#x27;t it amazing that despite their good intentions, that so many of them are hustlers and shysters? I&#x27;m not making a direct moral comparison, but a pragmatic one ...<p>It would be nice to have some experiments that put String Theory to bed as well, though sadly, these are not even conceivable! The String Theorists careers are protected by the fact their theory cannot be unproven :)
评论 #12269739 未加载
ankurdhama将近 9 年前
This should send a strong message to the scientists who are more passionate about elegant and beauty of mathematics and think that nature is written in mathematics and using mathematics only they can figure out natures secret. I know this has worked couple of times in past where a mathematical theory predicted existence of some entity or phenomena and then it was found to be true through experiments BUT that doesn&#x27;t mean this trick will always work coz we try to understand nature using the tool of mathematics and nature doesn&#x27;t give a crap about what we use to understand it.
评论 #12261152 未加载
评论 #12259996 未加载
评论 #12259989 未加载
评论 #12259985 未加载
评论 #12260986 未加载
gumby将近 9 年前
Naturally this topic calls for an xkcd: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;401&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;401&#x2F;</a><p>And more appropriate to the diphoton bump: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;1437&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;1437&#x2F;</a>
评论 #12260881 未加载
combatentropy将近 9 年前
Stunningly lucid writing. Good job, Natalie Wolchover!
Animats将近 9 年前
What does it mean? Layoffs, probably.<p>We may have reached the end of what big accelerators can tell us. Fermilab was shut down in 2011.
评论 #12259961 未加载
评论 #12260780 未加载
7sigma将近 9 年前
Does anybody know the consequences of this regarding the search for dark matter? Specifically, dark matter particles?
评论 #12261735 未加载
sctb将近 9 年前
Related discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12238197" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12238197</a>
评论 #12257731 未加载
steve_taylor将近 9 年前
No new particles means that we&#x27;re going to need a bigger accelerator.
评论 #12260476 未加载
评论 #12260446 未加载