TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ghost Browser

37 点作者 nichodges将近 9 年前

17 条评论

danso将近 9 年前
Just out of curiousity: how many people here use Google Chrome&#x27;s multiple-user feature? Non-techie people generally don&#x27;t know about it, but I&#x27;m surprised I don&#x27;t see it being used by the (few) webdevs I know personally.<p>I have a Chrome user account attached to my main Gmail account. I&#x27;ve created another Chrome user account that&#x27;s tied to my school email, so that I can keep school-related things isolated to that account. But I can operate both Chrome account simulataneously without issue or conflict; I just set the theme of my school-focused browser to match the school colors. It takes very little effort and so I wonder what&#x27;s the point of using a separate niche browser?<p>The multiple Chrome user system is especially useful for web development. I&#x27;m not a fan of having 20 webdevs plugins (such as React&#x27;s special debugger) running on everything that I visit. So I make a new Chrome user just for dev plugins, with the devtools configured exactly as I need them. Sometimes when I&#x27;m debugging a live site, I need a stock browser experience (I.e. No Adblock)...so that gets its own Chrome user. You don&#x27;t have to set up a new Google account to create a Chrome user; that&#x27;s only necessary if you want your plugins&#x2F;settings to be stored in the cloud. Otherwise it&#x27;s literally a 3-click process to create new users and switch between them.
评论 #12274130 未加载
评论 #12274002 未加载
评论 #12274170 未加载
评论 #12275212 未加载
评论 #12274071 未加载
评论 #12274578 未加载
评论 #12274425 未加载
评论 #12277181 未加载
gggggggg将近 9 年前
Google cache view <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache:http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ghostbrowser.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache:http:&#x2F;&#x2F;...</a><p>edit: Not sure why this got a down vote. Site is offline. Cache view will help.
sankha93将近 9 年前
Firefox Nightly has Container Tabs [1] which have different sessions even though they are a part of the same widow. Also the tabs are colour coded to show that they are different containers.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;tanvi&#x2F;2016&#x2F;06&#x2F;16&#x2F;contextual-identities-on-the-web&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;tanvi&#x2F;2016&#x2F;06&#x2F;16&#x2F;contextual-identit...</a>
评论 #12273916 未加载
评论 #12275090 未加载
评论 #12273894 未加载
andreineculau将近 9 年前
In 2016, a browser that needs not only an account registration, but a registration disguised as a &quot;beta invite&quot; (i.e. will send you download links to your email) is nothing but a bad joke and a waste of time.
red_admiral将近 9 年前
A chromium derivative whose key selling point is that it makes something a bit easier which the base version can already do, but you need to sign up for one of their &quot;limited beta invites&quot;? Hmm ... totally doesn&#x27;t sound like snake oil.
评论 #12273955 未加载
tener将近 9 年前
Nicely done but claims like this:<p>&gt; Increase productivity 200% or more<p>are dodgy. Where did they get this number from?
评论 #12273977 未加载
评论 #12274269 未加载
评论 #12274076 未加载
robin_reala将近 9 年前
<i>Ghost Browser is built on Chromium so it already works like your favorite browser</i><p>I wonder how they got a Firefox compatibility mode into Chromium?
mrmondo将近 9 年前
The sites dead but I hope this isn&#x27;t just another javascript application based on another browser.<p>Edit: got to it via google cache, looks like it&#x27;s just based on chromium, didn&#x27;t check to see if it had more JavaScript in it though as it didn&#x27;t do anything to interest me.<p>I&#x27;d love to see a completely newly written browser in Go, C or Swift that is written from the ground up with security and privacy as it&#x27;s key concern followed by speed. It&#x27;d need to be quite modular by design so that security components could easily be upgraded over time and so that new web technologies could be added as they appear. Multi-process, addon (if any) sand boxing and local to-a-directory synchronisation would be wonderful.
评论 #12273860 未加载
评论 #12275153 未加载
rvern将近 9 年前
You can get the same functionality in Firefox by setting privacy.userContext.enabled to true in about:config. Enjoy.<p>(More information: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.mozilla.org&#x2F;Security&#x2F;Contextual_Identity_Project&#x2F;Containers." rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.mozilla.org&#x2F;Security&#x2F;Contextual_Identity_Projec...</a>)
marknadal将近 9 年前
RE: &quot;Error establishing a database connection&quot;, oh jolly - I did a whole talk on this. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;video.webcamp.si&#x2F;wc2016_nadal_the_frontend_backend_without_devops&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;video.webcamp.si&#x2F;wc2016_nadal_the_frontend_backend_wi...</a><p>RE: Ghost. The landing page looks gorgeous, great job! Not being able to download the browser is kind of silly - especially when it is an app (not a service) that is built ontop of Chromium.
Nullabillity将近 9 年前
But... can&#x27;t Chrome can already do this?
评论 #12273770 未加载
评论 #12273874 未加载
评论 #12273775 未加载
wiredfool将近 9 年前
Is there a way, using something like the virtualization api on OS X, to have a fully separate browser with no write access to the file system? Looking for something like incognito mode, but with stronger sandboxing, but without some of the flash api restrictions that it has.
评论 #12274314 未加载
dredmorbius将近 9 年前
June 3, 2016 archive:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20160603220849&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ghostbrowser.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20160603220849&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ghostbrows...</a>
joebergeron将近 9 年前
&gt;&gt; &quot;Stop wrestling with multiple browsers.&quot;<p>Is this a problem many people actually have? Genuinely curious, don&#x27;t mean to belittle their efforts.<p>Although, do we need a brand new browser? How does it compare in terms of performance?
batiudrami将近 9 年前
This seems like quite a niche feature to build and market a browser around.
bobajeff将近 9 年前
With the name I thought this was going to be a browser focused on privacy and removing digital fingerprints.<p>What a disappointing waste of good name and trademark.
sleepychu将近 9 年前
Is this a different browser (fork?) or is it a chrome extension?