TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

135M messages a second between processes in Java (2013)

262 点作者 matteuan将近 9 年前

8 条评论

carsongross将近 9 年前
The JVM is a treasure just sitting there waiting to be rediscovered.<p>It really is a shame that there is so much noise and unnecessary complexity around using it.
评论 #12283810 未加载
评论 #12284007 未加载
评论 #12283858 未加载
评论 #12283617 未加载
评论 #12284769 未加载
评论 #12283723 未加载
评论 #12283590 未加载
评论 #12284000 未加载
评论 #12284016 未加载
评论 #12283859 未加载
jpalomaki将近 9 年前
There&#x27;s also more light weight alternatives to &quot;XML heavy traditional frameworks&quot; on Java side. Check for example Play[1], which makes the &quot;write some code, test in browser, write more, test&quot; cycle possible.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.playframework.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.playframework.com</a>
atemerev将近 9 年前
Java in HFT environment is wonderfully perverse and beautifully abused in so many ways.
评论 #12284176 未加载
srtjstjsj将近 9 年前
Is there any reason someone would want to run multiple Java processes communicating at high speed? It seems useless, since the massive overhead of each process makes IPC useless in a high-performance environment.
评论 #12283709 未加载
评论 #12283781 未加载
xchip将近 9 年前
Moving blocks of memory around is something I am expecting java to do quite fast, just because the VM has intrinsic instructions to do that. You could do the same thing in any other language.
评论 #12283666 未加载
option_greek将近 9 年前
With all those memory accesses marked as unsafe, I&#x27;m wondering why not just use C++.
bogomipz将近 9 年前
Can someone elaborate on this:<p>&quot;IPC, what&#x27;s the problem? Inter Process Communication is an old problem and there are many ways to solve it (which I will not discuss here).&quot;<p>How is IPC an old problem and how was it solved?
评论 #12284034 未加载
评论 #12284025 未加载
leeoniya将近 9 年前
(2013)
评论 #12283400 未加载