TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Yet Another Government-Sponsored Malware

45 点作者 r0h1n超过 8 年前

7 条评论

r721超过 8 年前
Recent discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12253632" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12253632</a>
Phithagoras超过 8 年前
More detailed post from Kaspersky here <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;securelist.com&#x2F;analysis&#x2F;publications&#x2F;75533&#x2F;faq-the-projectsauron-apt&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;securelist.com&#x2F;analysis&#x2F;publications&#x2F;75533&#x2F;faq-the-p...</a>
jcoffland超过 8 年前
I find it ridiculous that any time a really well written malware is found it is assumed that it must have been written by a government. Since when has government been the example of efficiency and clarity that is requisite to high quality software? The Open-Source world is full of examples of non-state programmers writing excellent code that does amazing things.
Dolores12超过 8 年前
Stoxnet was discovered by Belorussian anti-virus company, Duqu &amp; Project Sauron were discovered by Kaspersky Lab. Are US-based anti-virus companies that bad or ...?
评论 #12306024 未加载
评论 #12305639 未加载
monkmartinez超过 8 年前
I am not a security expert, but it doesn&#x27;t seem that hard to figure out how this is being done. Lots of money to an insider&#x2F;spy&#x2F;human that has access to the places one would like to install said malware. Most of these stories seem to involve good, old fashioned social engineering. Albeit, social engineering with with lots of money or another kind of leverage.<p>Or... maybe I am naive. I just tend to look at this stuff with how can we get this done the easiest way??? Human emotions are much easier to target than silicon.
unsignedqword超过 8 年前
Do any consumer AV suites actually try identifying and removing or quarantining state-actor-level malware?
评论 #12305740 未加载
dguido超过 8 年前
Schneier is basically blogspam. Quotes entirely from another article, follows up with &quot;I don&#x27;t know what this means???&quot; Why do people keep reading him?
评论 #12305763 未加载
评论 #12305838 未加载
评论 #12305749 未加载
评论 #12305597 未加载