TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Like It or Not, “Smart Drugs” Are Coming to the Office

20 点作者 primodemus将近 9 年前

6 条评论

imh将近 9 年前
I'm surprised not to see a single mention of coffee. I've used it as a drug plenty of times (not drinking it because I want to, but because I need the caffeine boost to meet expectations), and so has pretty much everyone I know. Does the discussion change because something only comes in pill form or is synthetic?
评论 #12307635 未加载
评论 #12306097 未加载
ap22213将近 9 年前
Are ADHD medications really that effective for those without ADHD? They can boost your mood, for sure. And, they can keep you awake. But, for me, the dosage needs to be precisely adjusted just to be effective, and I have to take them just to be functional.<p>I&#x27;ve seen a lot of people in the workplace taking them lately. But, the result isn&#x27;t pretty. Overly focused but on all the wrong things. Less creative. In a tweaked out state where they just keep switching tasks. Or, sending rambling emails or going on long tangents about nothing. To me, it seems like they were much more effective before the medications.<p>I remember watching a show years ago where the hosts had drugged people doing different types of tasks. One of them was amphetamine, and they were trying to put an ikea desk together. But, they took a really long time because of all of the reasons above.<p>Interestingly, ADHD has strong genetic correlation and has comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders. And, ADHD was certainly under diagnosed for a long time, as were many mental diseases. In the US there is strong social pressure to not reveal mental diseases, and it&#x27;s awkward to discuss them with others because many people don&#x27;t even believe they are real. It&#x27;s sad really, because many smart people could have succeeded in life if only they had been diagosed and treated.
damptowel将近 9 年前
Maybe it&#x27;s because of my sentimental mood, but I can&#x27;t help but think, perhaps we&#x27;re too focused on achieving maximum productivity in a competitive market. It&#x27;s like for the first time in history abundance for every human being is a possibility yet humanity has not broken free of its mindset to claim ownership over scarce resources. A means to an end has become a means in itself. There was an article on here recently about humans becoming more like preprogrammed automata by the living environment we have set up, in our global hyperconnected society with it&#x27;s carefully constructed sociocultural normativity it&#x27;s like we&#x27;re building a cybernetic collective concious inside some Huxlean dystopia.<p>Drugs and human augmentation to fuel the rat race, good grief, anyone actually think that&#x27;s a noble thing to strive for?
评论 #12307458 未加载
ArkyBeagle将近 9 年前
Sure. Take an organization past its prime ( for path-dependent and ironclad reasons ) and raise the mental voltage&#x2F;head pressure.<p>Look, just getting activities sorted by precedence should be enough for most things. Organizations all have &quot;hull speed&quot;. Adding more motor won&#x27;t help.<p>We <i>have</i> to get past making drugs some sort of moral nexus, and only concentrate on the pragmatic effects of them.
thesz将近 9 年前
You already have two wonderful smart drugs at your disposal, they are called &quot;walk&quot; and &quot;rest&quot;.<p>Walk rises blood level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, growing neurons and synapses. Rest allows other important parts of brain to be heard, making you sharp and creative.<p>Walking can help you with Parkinson&#x27;s disease and Alzheimer [1]. Show me &quot;smart drug&quot; that can do that.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.medicalnewstoday.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;279085.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.medicalnewstoday.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;279085.php</a>
anonbanker将近 9 年前
could this be considered a success for the Transhumanism movement?