TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Gawker.com to end operations next week after nearly 14 years of operation

72 点作者 jeo1234将近 9 年前

9 条评论

gmarx将近 9 年前
The article praises Gawker for often &quot;punching up&quot;. For the youngens this &quot;don&#x27;t punch down&quot; rule that someone recently invented is a load of hooey. People who control the mainstream media define up and down and tell you it is beyond the pale to make fun of any aspect of those defined as down.<p>Honestly as an older gentleman (hehe) it&#x27;s shocking how badly we have clamped down on free speech. When I was young we would wonder how much wilder can the next generation of kids get? How far will the bounds of free expression be expanded.<p>The answer turned out to be &quot;not at all&quot;. These things go in cycles and the current round of private sector driven censorship (yes, please explain to me how the private sector can&#x27;t censor) is probably a reaction to the free wheeling days from the late 1950s to about the late 1980s.
minimaxir将近 9 年前
Official announcement: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gawker.com&#x2F;gawker-com-to-end-operations-next-week-1785455712" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gawker.com&#x2F;gawker-com-to-end-operations-next-week-178...</a> (Gawker.com is a banned domain so a third-party domain is necessary for submission. Although I guess that doesn&#x27;t matter anymore).<p>Note that this does not affect other sites in the Gawker network (Gizmodo, Jalopnik, etc.)
grabcocque将近 9 年前
The thing I don&#x27;t understand is how that jury arrived at its stratospheric damages figure. Was it designed by the jury to be high enough to put gawker out of business?<p>I mean. I have no sympathy for Gawker, and don&#x27;t think there are any interesting free speech principles at stake here, I just don&#x27;t understand it.
评论 #12315012 未加载
评论 #12315067 未加载
评论 #12315011 未加载
jmulvi将近 9 年前
Gawker was an entertaining read and loved by many. Doesn&#x27;t this 10 year long vendetta against a popular news website make Peter Thiel look like an out-of-touch evil Bond villain. I&#x27;m not saying he is one, but to use a Trumpism, many people are saying he is.
评论 #12314877 未加载
评论 #12314882 未加载
评论 #12315587 未加载
toomuchtodo将近 9 年前
Before anyone asks, ArchiveTeam is on this already.
评论 #12317923 未加载
socalnate1将近 9 年前
As much as I hate gawker.com, I hate the way they were destroyed even more.
评论 #12314550 未加载
评论 #12314633 未加载
评论 #12314886 未加载
评论 #12314673 未加载
评论 #12317069 未加载
fixxer将近 9 年前
On the upside, some nice office space in Manhattan coming on the market.
评论 #12316481 未加载
sctb将近 9 年前
Recent discussion about the bankruptcy and sale: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11877814" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11877814</a>
ilostmykeys将近 9 年前
Censored?