TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why cyclists should be able to roll through stop signs, ride through red lights

40 点作者 RyanMcGreal超过 8 年前

19 条评论

mazelife超过 8 年前
Although the article alluded to studies that show this approach is safer it didn&#x27;t bother to cite any. Here&#x27;s one based on results when the law passed in Iowa: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;docplayer.net&#x2F;1126976-Meggs-jason-n-stops-harm-bikes-page-1-of-15-title-page.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;docplayer.net&#x2F;1126976-Meggs-jason-n-stops-harm-bikes-...</a><p>Slowing down as you approach the stop sign, scanning the full 360 degrees around the intersection (which, unlike cars, cyclists are able to do easily and quickly), being prepared to stop if necessary, but continuing on through if there&#x27;s no reason to do so, is perfectly safe.<p>I&#x27;d make the analogy thusly: as a cyclist coming to a stop sign, I&#x27;ve got to come to a stop, get off my seat and set foot on the ground, remount, then get going again from a standstill. When you&#x27;re doing this every few blocks--which is not at all uncommon when biking in the city--it gets extremely frustrating. As a car driver, imagine if you had to come to a complete stop at a stop sign, turn off the ignition, then restart the car and continue on your way. It feels like the same thing. (edit: used more clear terminology)
评论 #12353744 未加载
评论 #12351720 未加载
skjdflsiugf超过 8 年前
As a cyclist of 40 years who&#x27;s (hopefully) learned from their mistakes, I strongly disagree. Not only is it unsafe, pisses-off drivers and pedestrians, gives cyclists a bad name, but it&#x27;s also completely unnecessary because you&#x27;ll easily catch-up with cyclists who shot the lights at the next intersection anyway without even trying. That&#x27;s what cyclists who shoot lights don&#x27;t get is that it&#x27;s actually not any faster in the long run. Having said that, I suspect that many drivers who are pissed-off by cyclists shooting lights would be the ones doing it themselves if they were on bikes because it&#x27;s really just a form of road-rage. Yes, some cyclists are stupidly aggressive, but so are many drivers.
评论 #12359725 未加载
评论 #12359483 未加载
评论 #12359767 未加载
评论 #12359797 未加载
评论 #12359592 未加载
评论 #12359703 未加载
评论 #12359792 未加载
gamblor956超过 8 年前
Always used to see a guy cycling on my commute home. He&#x27;d roll through every stop sign and most traffic signals. (He explained one day that it &quot;saved energy&quot; for him to keep going...even though he cycled as &quot;exercise...&quot;)<p>I don&#x27;t see him anymore. One day last year, he rolled through a red light in Koreatown, right into a truck which had the right of way. He was thrown from his bike about 20 feet and died from blunt force trauma and&#x2F;or internal bleeding by the time paramedics arrived.
评论 #12359683 未加载
评论 #12359517 未加载
评论 #12359802 未加载
评论 #12359774 未加载
upofadown超过 8 年前
After having spent a ridiculous amount of time on a bike recently, I now believe the difference is perceptional. When you drive you are in a glassed in box. The glass has no anti-reflective coating so you see a lot of moving reflections. This makes peripheral vision mostly useless. You have blind spots that you have to move your head to overcome. Your line of sight is lower to the ground. You can&#x27;t hear anything outside the car unless you have your window down and then probably not either. You can&#x27;t talk to anyone, the best you can do is honk your horn in an slow speed possible collision situation.<p>So compared to a cyclist&#x2F;pedestrian a driver is deaf, dumb and partially blind. So it makes perfect sense that cars have to stop and other transportation modes do not.<p>This disparity becomes quite poignant when someone in a car stops to let a cyclist&#x2F;pedestrian cross the street when they actually have the right of way. They are expecting the cyclist&#x2F;pedestrian to trust their life to the judgment of someone who is quite isolated from the environment.
truantbuick超过 8 年前
Cyclist commuter here. Red lights should be red lights to everybody.<p>However, Idaho stops are the way future. It&#x27;s just doesn&#x27;t make sense to apply the same &quot;come to a complete stop&quot; standard to cyclists. They&#x27;re traveling at a much lower speed and have much less ability to accelerate. The extra time it takes to come to a complete stop (which means finding your balance at a stand still), and then remounting the bike accelerating through the intersection is not worth it, and makes the commute that much more of a slog.<p>I think characterizing the Idaho stop as &quot;rolling through the intersection&quot; might be a little bit misleading, since it conveys a really lax attitude. Idaho stops are generally quite safe.<p>Edit: In most cases, Idaho stops have very similar cadence to a car coming to a full stop. You slow down up to the line, look all around you, determine the right of way, and if you have it, you start peddling back up to cruising speed. The fact you don&#x27;t come to a complete stop is pretty much a technicality because the timing is almost the same.<p>If you come to a complete stop, the timing is all off, and there&#x27;s much more likely to be hesitation and ambiguity. Starting from a stop takes a lot more time, is much more likely to lead to false-starts, and puts you in a very vulnerable position.
评论 #12359809 未加载
评论 #12359885 未加载
IgorPartola超过 8 年前
Seems like TFA is an opinion piece and cites no research on actual safety. It alludes to one reason this is good: getting the cyclist out of the intersection, and therefore greater danger, sooner. Another good reason might be to make cyclists&#x27; behavior more predictable. As is, you never know which type of rider you are going to get, so you can&#x27;t make assumptions.<p>I think an actually safer thing to do would be to give cyclists the right of way. Then drivers could at least take for granted that cyclists are going to not stop for red lights or stop signs.
评论 #12351752 未加载
brudgers超过 8 年前
This is a half measure. What cyclists need is access to limited access, pedestrian free, well maintained roadways.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;books&#x2F;effective-cycling-0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;books&#x2F;effective-cycling-0</a>
评论 #12359928 未加载
rwl4超过 8 年前
&quot;... Oftentimes, they don&#x27;t trigger traffic lights to change, because many run on inductive sensors buried in the road (the reason for all the &quot;Dead Red&quot; laws in the map above).&quot;<p>This drove me crazy when I lived in Seattle. Many of their lights would never turn. So I would have to get off my bike, walk over and press the button. Now that I live in NYC, Idaho stops are the norm where nearly everybody, including the casual cyclist does it and tickets are few and far between, it not only takes my commute from 15 minutes to (literally) 4 minutes, but I feel safer because I&#x27;ll usually leave a huge pile of traffic behind me with a clear road around me for blocks since they stop at every light and I don&#x27;t.<p>Of course, NYC has a 25mph city-wide speed limit, so that helps dramatically.<p>I think the most important thing here is being obsessive about looking for cars and yielding appropriately. If you fail to do that and are a daredevil who just blindly runs out into traffic, which I see fairly regularly, you are putting your life at risk and potentially others around you as well.<p>Edit: Looks like Seattle just passed a dead-red law last year! Now if they would just classify electric skateboards as bicycles like California did, that would be spectacular.
simonbarker87超过 8 年前
One thing I find frustrating about driving in the US is that stop signs are everywhere! Even on a fully open junction in a quiet suburb where you can see a good few hundred feet down the road, you still have to stop. I know it&#x27;s the law, but why?<p>In the UK you don&#x27;t have to stop at every junction, if the junction is open (i.e. you can see traffic clearly) and it&#x27;s clear you can go on through without stopping. If the junction is closed (i.e. you can&#x27;t see oncoming&#x2F;cross traffic) then you must stop, and get a good visual before pulling out.<p>As a result of this cyclists in the UK already don&#x27;t stop at junctions because, unless its a closed junction, no one has to stop if it&#x27;s clear.<p>I&#x27;m pretty sure in the US you can crawl right on a right light if it&#x27;s clear so what&#x27;s the difference in letting a cyclist carefully go through a stop sign or red light?
评论 #12359815 未加载
评论 #12359638 未加载
dogma1138超过 8 年前
How about no. Stop signs were designed to prevent people being hit by crossing traffic.<p>This isn&#x27;t just a to protect the cyclists from being hit by cars, but to protect pedestrians from being hit by cyclists.<p>I&#x27;m sorry but my experience of living in London in the past 4 years pretty much made me hate cyclists with passion.<p>I find them considerably more dangerous and pesky than cars, they simply ignore all rules whether it&#x27;s not giving a flying duck about the red signal at a bike lane while pedestrians have the green light to cross the street, utterly ignoring no bikes allowed in the run&#x2F;walk only paths in Hyde Park or by interchanging road, bike lane, sidewalk and even the crosswalk at will with nill consideration to pedestrians and a shitty attitude to boot.<p>I&#x27;m constantly buzzed off green lights (to me) by cyclists that cycle at high speeds because they could not be arsed to honor a red light, I&#x27;ve been hit by bikes more than once in these 4 years, and just over the weekend I&#x27;ve seen a guy on a rental metro bike hit a baby carriage (empty one as far as i could tell) in Hyde Park because they were in a no-bike zone and came out a turn which has no visibility whatsoever.<p>I really don&#x27;t understand the level of self entitlement that cyclists seem to have and why they seem to have such a shitty attitude towards drivers and pedestrians alike. A bicycle rolling through a stop sign isn&#x27;t any less dangerous than a car rolling through one, if anything a car is easier to spot than a bicycle and cars don&#x27;t tend to have their visibility shuttered by driving between full lanes.<p>The reason why most countries do not allow roll through stop signs or at least heavily restrict them is that rolling through a stop sign sets the wrong behaviour pattern because once you get used to a stop sign you know you can roll over you aren&#x27;t going to slow down to roll over speed you might simply slow down by a bit but not nearly enough to respond appropriately.<p>The same thing is going to happen to cyclists they&#x27;ll get use to it and eventually get careless they won&#x27;t give 2 ducks about the padestrians trying to cross the road with already ludicrously short light times and they&#x27;ll take more and more risks as far as crossing the intersection goes.<p>Cyclists don&#x27;t have mandatory insurance, they can hit anyone and do pretty hefty damage if it&#x27;s at speed and good luck suing them for anything at least with cars in most countries you can always sue the insurance of the offending driver. Heck at this point I&#x27;m not even entirely sure if being hit by a bicycle in the UK constitutes a &quot;road accident&quot; so they might as well just take off and not give a flying duck about it, it happened to me got hit in the side I assume by the stem&#x2F;handlebars at pretty high speed the cyclist didn&#x27;t seem to give a shit at all and just wobbled a bit and continued on his way without even checking. It was a sharp pain but not bad enough however the night after half my side was purple if it would be a bit stronger or sharper hit I might&#x27;ve ended up pissing blood for 2 weeks.
评论 #12351429 未加载
评论 #12351674 未加载
imgabe超过 8 年前
&gt; Drivers might be angrily remembering the last biker they saw flout the law, wondering when traffic police will finally crack down and assign some tickets.<p>How about the laws where drivers have to maintain a minimum distance from cyclists? If I ever see <i>that</i> law enforced, I might start giving a shit about other traffic laws. Running lights allows me to get a head start on traffic and hopefully get to the <i>next</i> light&#x2F;stop sign before drivers try to murder me by passing within inches so they can stop 100 feet away a few seconds sooner.
评论 #12360037 未加载
mc32超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m curious about what Germans think of this, since people look a pedestrian askance if you don&#x27;t wait for the light.<p>As an occasional cyclist I&#x27;m of two minds. On the one hand, having too many stop signs along a roadway gets annoying so mentally one wants to simply slow down and look and if no cars have the right of way at the time, go through. The danger is that this behavior gets modified to a default of riding through and only slowing down if a motorist doesn&#x27;t give you right of way (slow down or wave on) and assuming that as a cyclist I have the primary right of way (weaving through pedestrians and cars) in other words wishing people and cars did not have to share (yes, it&#x27;s only a mindset, but one easy to allow to set in).<p>Also, since cycling is healthy, you get even more exercise by stopping and starting constantly so from a health perspective it&#x27;s better as it improves your workout and keeps you alive by preventing unnecessay collisions.
评论 #12359987 未加载
评论 #12359886 未加载
antoineMoPa超过 8 年前
While driving &amp; cycling, I observed that most cars here in Quebec pass through stops at speeds ranging from 15 to 30 km&#x2F;h by doing what we call an american-stop in Quebec-slang (&quot;stop américain&quot;). I suppose this also happens in the US.<p>In a car, 15-30 km&#x2F;h feels like you are really close to be completely stopped. It turns out that these speeds are pretty much the average cyclist speed range. (Cyclists may appear to go faster because they are smaller, just like trains look like they are slower than they really are).<p>I guess most frustrated car drivers don&#x27;t realize they are also &quot;breaking the law&quot; at stops. I can only recommend they start cycling, the endorphins would calm them.
zaccus超过 8 年前
OK, maybe the article is right and cyclists should be able to do Idaho stops. I&#x27;m open to allowing this if the available data says it&#x27;s safer for everyone.<p>What I can&#x27;t accept is some cyclists following the law and others not. Either everyone should do Idaho stops, or no one should. What settles that is the current law.<p>Are Idaho stops legal for cyclists where you live? No? Then until the law is changed they are not an option, period.
dynofuz超过 8 年前
Whenever someone yells at me for doing this i just tell them, &quot;it&#x27;s pareto efficient&quot; Of course, i slow down and make sure there are no cars or people in the way before crossing.
karma_vaccum123超过 8 年前
The cop who gives you a ticket probably doesn&#x27;t care about your Vox articles, Maclolm-Gladwell-grade pseudo statistics, or these comments.<p>At least in the Bay Area, cops are definitely willing to take the time to ticket cyclists. In Los Gatos where I live, the police will sometimes take a Saturday and just watch a busy intersection and literally ticket EVERY cyclist who blows through.<p>Of course we have also had a few cycling fatalities here, always the same story:cyclists blowing through intersections.<p>Don&#x27;t do it. Don&#x27;t be the asshole who makes life more difficult for other cyclists. No one cares about your bogus statistical arguments.
ivanhoe超过 8 年前
I don&#x27;t see how it&#x27;s safe to allow this for bikes, but it&#x27;s not safe for cars? Why not just allowing everyone to &quot;slow down and look for traffic&quot; and then decide if it&#x27;s safe to go through or not? That&#x27;s basically what you do when there&#x27;s no traffic lights and if people really slow down and look there will be rarely any problems with that. That&#x27;s how roundabouts function, and they are generally very safe.
评论 #12359718 未加载
mamon超过 8 年前
TL;DR; Why? Because we should encourage natural selection in humans. Only the fittest cyclists survive :)
galdosdi超过 8 年前
Yeah and no. Cyclists should not roll through anything until they&#x27;ve completely scanned the intersecting traffic, which usually requires stopping briefly (but may not, for intersections with good visiblity and low information density and riders who are good at holding a line at slow speeds -- exercise good judgment). You put your life in the hands of others whenever you enter an area you did not already successfully vet for the absence of opposing traffic.<p>But, waiting for a red when there&#x27;s no traffic is pointless. Also, there can be a lot of danger for cyclists, especially novices, when the light turns green, due to aggressive motor vehicles, so going through a traffic-free red can even be safer.<p>While you can argue that the same logic applies to cars, the potential for confusion&#x2F;abuse and the fact that cars weigh much more factors against allowing cars to follow the same rule. So, when cycling:<p>Treat stop signs as stop signs (NOT yields), and treat red lights as stop signs (NOT yields). Come to a _complete_ stop, scan, and if there&#x27;s no traffic in either direction, continue. Completely safe, but you save waiting for a red light to turn when there&#x27;s actually no traffic spooled up.<p>(Don&#x27;t forget to look both ways even on one way streets. If you run a red and get hit by a salmoner[1] you can&#x27;t really complain, can you?)<p>Get over the dismounting thing. Going through reds is about saving time waiting for it to turn to green, not about saving time dismounting. A good city rider should be really good at dis&#x2F;remounting seamlessly, as well as being able to ride at crawling speed without having to stop or swerve.<p>Try to get over the momentum thing too at least for a while. You&#x27;ll become a stronger faster more skilled cyclist this way anyway, and there&#x27;s nothing more pleasing than not just being &#x2F;faster&#x2F; than a cab, but actually &#x2F;accelerating&#x2F; more quickly than a cab despite all their cylinders and horsepower, and it&#x27;s going to take a lot of stop and go practice to get you there, so don&#x27;t slack on this. If you&#x27;re using clipless this goes double -- you need to get really good at unclipping&#x2F;reclipping so the worst thing you can do when you start is to jealously guard your momentum and never put your foot down.<p>Again, the key is, never go through an intersection that you haven&#x27;t already gotten total visibility into. Whether this lines up with signal phases or not is irrelevant. You can get run over by a misbehaving road user when you have a green too, and you should beware then as well, treating greens as (very soft) yields, especially in intersections with poor visibility or high information density (eg in Manhattan, crossing an avenue while going crosstown)<p>And of course, I&#x27;m human, so I don&#x27;t always practice what I preach. I often regret that later and wish I had.<p>[1] salmoner: slang for road user going the wrong way down a one way street (usually but not always a cyclist -- I observe that NYPD patrol cars also often do it, usually just because they can (no sirens) but sometimes to get to an emergency (sirens))