I would argue when people claim that they want more regulation, they want more effective regulation for the outcomes that matter to them.<p>Most people can agree that for a lifesaving product with few to no alternatives that has already well, well passed any period over which the profits have paid back R&D expenditure, there should be some control over how its price can increase over time.<p>Whether or not this outcome results in strictly more regulation, measured by lines of legislation or individuals with jobs charged enforcing it is irrelevant.