TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How Driverless Cars May Interact with People

28 点作者 pavornyoh超过 8 年前

3 条评论

stcredzero超过 8 年前
As a pedestrian, eye contact is very important to my interaction with drivers. If cars become truly driverless, will we then see psople behind the driver&#x27;s seat reading books? Will pedestrians fall out of the habit of establishing eye contact with drivers? Might there be a way for cars to signal that they&#x27;re &quot;looking at&quot; a pedestrian?<p>(Half joke: What if all driverless cars had to have a red &quot;cyclon eye&quot; in the middle of the front of the car?)
评论 #12393600 未加载
评论 #12393187 未加载
评论 #12393587 未加载
评论 #12392890 未加载
dsl超过 8 年前
I have always described self driving cars as the ultimate test of the the Trolley problem [1]. Does a self driving car have an obligation to protect the occupant at the risk of pedestrians? vice versa? What if the pedestrian or occupant is a Google executive?<p>EDIT: Apparently MIT has turned this whole line of thinking into an app where they collect a consensus on what a machine should decide: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;moralmachine.mit.edu&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;moralmachine.mit.edu&#x2F;</a><p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Trolley_problem" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Trolley_problem</a>
评论 #12393243 未加载
评论 #12392883 未加载
评论 #12392782 未加载
评论 #12393118 未加载
评论 #12408591 未加载
Animats超过 8 年前
Cars have body language. Small moves are useful, such as edging towards the side of a lane to indicate a turn. Edging towards a crosswalk where pedestrians are crossing against a signal will probably be necessary in some cities. Google already does some of this. This is probably more useful than adding indicators and signs.
评论 #12393328 未加载