Show HN: Live Dangerously – 1-for-1 anonymous photo sharing via SMS

Are you scrubbing Exif metadata on all these? I spot-checked a few and there didn&#x27;t seem to be any embedded. A surprising number of people have no idea that their mobile phone may embed GPS coordinates in images they take with it.<p>I think most social media sites do this by default but I wish they were more selective about it. Okay to scrub GPS location if present but copyright&#x2F;photographer&#x2F;exposure details, etc, are all helpful and should be kept if at all possible.

Aannddd..... I just got a dick pic as my first photo.

Surprising lack of penis pics, given my experience with chat roulette.

Maybe that&#x27;s because I&#x27;m not a native speaker of English, but I don&#x27;t get why it is named so. Could you please explain?

I think I like it ...<p>Negativity follows!<p>Not sure what it&#x27;s for? Seems like it&#x27;s trying to get a corpus for training image recognition - but then I can&#x27;t rate the tagging of images or highlight when they&#x27;ve failed (like one of the &quot;car&quot; images is an aeroplane interior).<p>I can&#x27;t link to a tag page. The images loading are shifting about and re-ordering which I find quite discombobulating and distracting. Some images -- someone&#x27;s takeaway of indiscernable type -- that are loading for the front-page are quite large, 800+kB to show me a thumbnail. I hope you&#x27;re not paying by the byte!<p>When you say anonymous, what&#x27;s the scope of that? I see your are using Twilio - does that mean you can tell Twilio to drop all logs of the sender details of the images? If I have a group of people send large images can I DDoS the site?

Curious, I wonder what the odds were of seeing a picture from my hometown of ~30,000 (Valparaiso, IN) in the stream :) . <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;valparaisoevents.com&#x2F;summer-outdoor-movies-recap&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;valparaisoevents.com&#x2F;summer-outdoor-movies-recap&#x2F;</a><p>Interesting service, I initially thought of it as a pen pal for the modern day where I&#x27;m linked to another account 1to1 instead of just receiving images from a stream. The rating aspect is unclear if 1 or 5 is better, I&#x27;m assuming 5 is better? Kinda fun but I&#x27;d be worried about receiving too many low quality pictures and I&#x27;d ignore posting again.

The name gives an implication that the photos being sent would be risque in nature. But clearly none of the photos shown are. Is anyone else confused by this?

Hmm, seems I can&#x27;t rate anymore, keep getting the following (disclosure, I earlier tried to rate a photo 3.5, may only accept INTs?)<p>You already rated the last photo you received. Send another photo and wait for the response before submitting another rating.

That first picture is definitely not vegetation or a flower.

Turns out one can recover background <i>sounds</i> from even still images: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;people.csail.mit.edu&#x2F;mrub&#x2F;VisualMic&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;people.csail.mit.edu&#x2F;mrub&#x2F;VisualMic&#x2F;</a>

Am I the only one who doesn&#x27;t understand what this is?

the tag small has an interesting half naked, half wasp, drawing...