TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Tony Fullman NSA Intercepts

60 点作者 sjreese超过 8 年前

4 条评论

peterkelly超过 8 年前
Here&#x27;s the article that the documents relate to, for context: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theintercept.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;08&#x2F;14&#x2F;nsa-gcsb-prism-surveillance-fullman-fiji&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theintercept.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;08&#x2F;14&#x2F;nsa-gcsb-prism-surveilla...</a>
评论 #12435245 未加载
audeyisaacs超过 8 年前
Is this a warning shot in the Shadow Brokers&#x2F;DNC battle? Snowden previously insinuated that the NSA had interfered with US ally&#x27;s elections...<p>Very unpleasant stuff, it&#x27;s disturbing to see how far it goes.
评论 #12438739 未加载
ChoHag超过 8 年前
I see a distinct lack of metadata.
评论 #12435251 未加载
aweisman超过 8 年前
At the top of every page is the following: <i>&quot;This information is provided for intelligence purposes in an effort to develop potential leads. It cannot be used in affidavits, court proceedings or subpoenas, or for other legal or judicial purposes&quot;</i>.<p>I understand that the NSA wants to hide their sources and methods, but it seems to me (as a non-lawyer), that this goes against the principles upon which courts are supposed to based. If they are going to charge someone with a crime (presumably the intended outcome of such an investigation, if it comes to anything), are they not supposed to provide all the evidence upon which those charges are based?