TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

EU Court: Open WiFi Operator Not Liable for Pirate Users

185 点作者 chewymouse超过 8 年前

2 条评论

zaroth超过 8 年前
So you can offer free internet access at your business in order to attract customers (e.g. Starbucks or McDonalds);<p><pre><code> The Court holds, first of all, that making a Wi-Fi network available to the general public free of charge in order to draw the attention of potential customers to the goods and services of a shop constitutes an ‘information society service’ under the directive on [electronic commerce],” the decision reads. </code></pre> However copyright holders can still obtain an injunction forcing the provider to institute some measure of access control which must collect the identities of end-users to provide a deterrent. TFA does not mention any requirements on retention or access to this tracking data.<p><pre><code> &quot;The Court nevertheless underlines that, in order to ensure that deterrent effect, it is necessary to require users to reveal their identity to be prevented from acting anonymously before obtaining the required password,” the ruling adds. </code></pre> So in essence they want to treat open WiFi APs as a type of mini-ISP. I&#x27;d say this is extremely problematic.<p>If you have to disclose your identity in order to use free WiFi it pretty much kills free WiFi. The court seemed to understand that terminating the service was not an appropriate remedy, but then proceeded to shoot it in the back.
评论 #12514698 未加载
评论 #12518157 未加载
评论 #12514630 未加载
评论 #12514569 未加载
评论 #12514764 未加载
bluesign超过 8 年前
I suspect this logic can also apply to tor exit nodes, which is more troublesome.
评论 #12514936 未加载