TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple is not a technology company

41 点作者 hariis超过 8 年前

23 条评论

jmfayard超过 8 年前
&gt; Apple doesn’t give a shit about neckbeard hipsters who spent thousands of dollars on expensive audiophile gear that rely on 100-year-old technology to transmit audio signals.<p>Is that stance from a reductio ad absurdum contest? Like nobody ever use with great success an humble audio cable for non expensive audio stuff in the real world outside the silicon valley?<p>My modest proposal : if you really want to remove an more than often annoying 150-years old technology that we don&#x27;t realize yet we don&#x27;t really need it<p>... remove the Phone from the iPhone
评论 #12516418 未加载
评论 #12516286 未加载
评论 #12526415 未加载
评论 #12516615 未加载
polartx超过 8 年前
I was really excited about some aspects of AirPods, like the IR sensor that could detect whether you had them in, and pause audio accordingly.<p>Then I saw a photo of what wearing AirPods looks like from the front (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iostipsandtricks.biz&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;1473&#x2F;7957d419aacdf6a.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iostipsandtricks.biz&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;1473&#x2F;7957...</a>)<p>Apple will still sell a mountain of them, because Apple is really good at changing peoples&#x27; perceptions of what looks bad, to looking good. The Apple watch is a perfect example. Square watches with rubber bands never looked cool. Motorola innovated a round digital face with the Moto360, and Apple responds with a square digital watch, with a rubber band.
评论 #12516622 未加载
评论 #12516238 未加载
评论 #12518623 未加载
评论 #12516258 未加载
phodo超过 8 年前
I made this comment before - the real value of the airpods is the foundational work for VR snd other things that go on your head. Wireless is critical. I have a hololens and DK2 beta, and the difference between untethered and tethered is hYOOOOGE. Airpods are v1.0 that will figure out latency issues, push the limits on bandwidth, push sensor capabilities, explore onboard DSP functions, gather data to feed into machine learning models for head and other behaviors, etc. It is the &quot;scout&quot; that is deployed deep in enemy territory to lay the foundation for the cavalry&#x27;s entry into what will emerge as one or more multibillion dollar markets (e.g. VR, new interface paradigms, brain computers that plug into the cortex :).<p>Apple is fantastic about introducing a foundational technology that people puzzle over, and then follow that MVP with a set of killer, well understood features for the mass market that leverage it (touch id followed by apple pay). To summarize:<p>* v1: Introduce puzzling HW&#x2F;SW enabling technology disguised as a feature &#x2F; roadmap swimlane, to work out the kinks, de-risk the technology.<p>* v2: Introduce clear-as-daylight applications for the mass market that leverage earlier work.<p>Look at the early days of AirPlay. I recall streaming wireless music to my speakers back in the mid 2000s, and how buggy it was &#x2F; how much latency there was. Lo and behold, many iterations later, and we have seamless audio and video airplay (ok, almost seamless). What makes me an expert on this stuff? Nothing, other than thinking about it and using it for many hours. This has nothing to do with jewelry.
aetherson超过 8 年前
Well, that writing style certainly is calculated to make me think that the author is a douche.<p>As to the substance of the argument: if your basic point is connecting AirPods to the Apple Watch, then man, you&#x27;re really begging the question. I suppose it&#x27;s possible that the watch will eventually become a big success, but it just has not yet.<p>(I was also amused to see the gold Edition watch ad in there -- the gold has been discontinued and the Edition has gotten a 90% price break).
评论 #12516586 未加载
评论 #12516435 未加载
hota_mazi超过 8 年前
&gt; Apple doesn’t give a shit about neckbeard hipsters who...<p>This is always what we hear from Apple advocates trying to justify a bad decision on Apple&#x27;s part.<p>&quot;Apple doesn&#x27;t care about third party apps, they want to control the experience on their iPhone, so no app store&quot;<p>&quot;Apple doesn&#x27;t care about multiple resolutions, that&#x27;s fragmentation&quot;<p>&quot;Apple doesn&#x27;t care about market share, they care about revenue&quot;<p>... ad nauseam.
评论 #12516637 未加载
apecat超过 8 年前
Apple&#x27;s AirPods will probably suck, audio wise, but there&#x27;s a chance they&#x27;re sturdy as hell. I know because I&#x27;ve used Apple&#x27;s otherwise useless EarPods to listen to spoken word content and to fall asleep with for years.<p>The only thing that break on the EarPods are the cables, and if you&#x27;re not like making knots intentionally, you can wake up in the morning tangled in them for more than a year before they start to break.<p>So, yeah, I like the eur 500 worth of other headphones I own at the moment too. Sure, it&#x27;s weird I&#x27;ll need to use some goddamned dingus to attach them to my next phone.<p>But fuck me if we&#x27;re still stuck with current wired tech for audiophile gear in 2030. It&#x27;s not like I want to use shitty headphones out and about. I do because I don&#x27;t want to fuck up the cables, etc. And wireless headphones still suck, universally.<p>We live in the future now for goodness&#x27; sakes and Bluetooth audio is only marginally less useless than it was ten years ago.<p>So yeah, if you&#x27;ve got any sense of pride over where wearable tech should be taking us, please, roll over and beg that this infusion of Apple&#x27;s proprietary shitty cans into the marketplace will raise adoption of voice control <i>and</i> increase development of less shitty hardware to make music and user interface appear in our fucking ears with no wires.<p>I don&#x27;t own any Apple stock so I don&#x27;t really give shit, except I prefer to buy tech somehow designed to fit together. If Apple crashes and burns because they&#x27;re trying to make wearable computers in your ears a thing, so be it.
ChrisLTD超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m skeptical for a few reasons:<p>* AirPods don&#x27;t look all that great, even if they are familiar in design<p>* AirPods are expensive<p>* Siri isn&#x27;t useful enough yet<p>* Talking to Siri in public still feels weird<p>* Talking to Siri in a shared office environment feels even weirder
评论 #12516276 未加载
zzguy超过 8 年前
Except for us with oddly shaped ears, where ear buds have always been the bane of our existence. They won&#x27;t stay in my ear, no matter what. Call me a neckbeard hipster all you want, I still like over-the-ear headphones, and Apple&#x27;s &quot;revolution&quot; can suck it.
评论 #12516449 未加载
评论 #12516366 未加载
moron4hire超过 8 年前
I don&#x27;t understand why people are getting so upset about other people getting upset about a feature being removed. &quot;No, you&#x27;re wrong, it&#x27;s good for you to not have this thing you wanted.&quot;
评论 #12516685 未加载
rplst8超过 8 年前
One argument I haven&#x27;t seen much of is how these new wireless technologies make things less future proof. In 200 years I can splice some copper wire to a pair of headphones and maybe make them work. Good luck trying to get some goofball wireless standard to work let alone some proprietary one.
评论 #12516865 未加载
imissmyjuno超过 8 年前
5 hours of listening time on the AirPods…
评论 #12516254 未加载
seanwilson超过 8 年前
&gt; What Apple has done is produce something that isn’t a technology product, but is, rather, a fashion object<p>Is there a general consensus that they look fashionable? I was surprised how they look almost exactly like the old headphones with the wire cut off instead of having an entirely new design.<p>I think bluetooth headphones in general are great personally. Not having wires getting caught in things is ideal, there&#x27;s no wire getting itself into knots, I find pairing easy and when some headsets have 20+ hours of battery the battery life really isn&#x27;t an issue. I&#x27;m not sure what all the fuss is about myself.
评论 #12516357 未加载
PeterWhittaker超过 8 年前
Others have commented on the tone of the article. Sure, they&#x27;re right. Doesn&#x27;t matter.<p>Sometimes the value of an article or observation is how it flips your view of the world around.<p><i>Apple is a fashion brand that makes jewelry that connects to the internet</i><p>Huh. I&#x27;ve never seen or heard it expressed so well before. I&#x27;ve read comments about &quot;integrated ecosystem&quot; and all kinds of other babble.<p>But that, right there? <i>Fashion company</i>? That&#x27;s the money quote.<p>Remember how YC tends to invest in teams, not ideas, people, not tech? Tech is fast, tech is cheap, tech is transitory. (Sure fashion is transitory, too - but people are always buying the next one.)<p>Apple and a few other &quot;tech&quot; companies just use - and in some cases build - incredibly advanced tech. Viewing them from the perspective of the engineer or MBA means one sees a narrow slice of who they are.<p>But viewed as <i>a fashion brand</i>, Apple is a whole other thing. Those are the terms on which it should be evaluated.<p>(I offer no evaluation. My head is still spinning from the perspective jolt.)
评论 #12516989 未加载
adamio超过 8 年前
Sort of reminds me of the UI from the movie Her. Fully integrated handheld and ear piece
评论 #12516561 未加载
评论 #12516271 未加载
dang超过 8 年前
We changed the baity title (&quot;Silicon Valley&quot; is pretty close to universally counting as linkbait in titles now, and the rest was over the edge) to a subtitle that appears to summarize the author&#x27;s argument.
Kluny超过 8 年前
This is the part that made it make sense to me:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net&#x2F;max&#x2F;1200&#x2F;1*N9h4FVkyYoZoipi4PTK1Fg.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net&#x2F;max&#x2F;1200&#x2F;1*N9h4FVkyYoZ...</a><p>[Image of person wearing earbugs; text &quot;Wireless headphones. Finally untangled.&quot;]<p>Tangled headphone cords aren&#x27;t sexy and never will be. Removing them altogether is the logical next move.<p>I just wish the replacement was better than Bluetooth.
评论 #12516351 未加载
skybrian超过 8 年前
As someone who wears a hearing aid, I can see how it might be nice if Apple made wearing earpieces more fashionable. (Not that I&#x27;ve had any problems, but I can imagine younger people with hearing loss caring about this.)<p>But that doesn&#x27;t mean they will succeed. Sometimes an Apple product turns out to be a flop. Despite their best efforts, it&#x27;s not as cool as they wanted it to be.
octo_t超过 8 年前
This article says what I&#x27;ve been thinking&#x2F;trying to explain to people about this.<p>Before the iPhone, the only people who had&#x2F;wanted smart phones were &quot;uncool&quot; business people[1].<p>And I think its the case with bluetooth headsets right now.<p>[1] - this may or may not have been the case, but it was definitely the general perception at the time.
评论 #12516198 未加载
评论 #12516240 未加载
评论 #12516419 未加载
oneloop超过 8 年前
&gt; the airpods drip with sex appeal<p>That&#x27;s like, your opinion man.<p>Some people need trinkets to get laid, others don&#x27;t ;-)
hariis超过 8 年前
Made me laugh hard after a long time, yet informative.. Any other articles like this?
评论 #12516071 未加载
Animats超过 8 年前
It&#x27;s the new iDweeb. Whether Apple can make this a fashion statement remains to be seen. The iWatch didn&#x27;t really get traction.
评论 #12516414 未加载
评论 #12516356 未加载
X86BSD超过 8 年前
It basically just came down to space on the phone AND they waited just like us for how many years for the &quot;industry&quot; to make Bluetooth not SUCK?! The industry failed and Apple moved on by making it not suck.<p>Enjoy your corded headphones.
评论 #12516221 未加载
jstsch超过 8 年前
Hear hear, these silly Airpods are a small revolution. Bluetooth headphones that don&#x27;t suck make quite a difference.