TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How Morality Changes in a Foreign Language

70 点作者 bangda超过 8 年前

8 条评论

thr0waway1239超过 8 年前
Perhaps I missed it, but I feel like an important aspect is being left out of this article. For the average person, English is not their native language. [1]<p>However, it is also becoming the &#x27;lingua franca&#x27; of science and the leading edge of technology - that is, even if it is only a second language, people are spending a lot of time thinking in it. As someone who is not a native English speaker, I am very often lost for words when expressing certain ideas in my own mother tongue (someone will helpfully point out that it is possible I didn&#x27;t learn my own language very well, which might also be true), <i>especially</i> when communicating concepts like privacy and such.<p>This leads to a gap - the number of ideas and concepts that can be expressed by the average person in their native language is less than the number of ideas and concepts that can be expressed in a non-native language, assuming the non-native language is English. Correspondingly, it is possible your brain is just that little bit more open and receptive to ideas, and sort of turns down its emotional reaction a little bit.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_languages_by_number_of...</a>
评论 #12522828 未加载
评论 #12522829 未加载
jondubois超过 8 年前
Regarding the Trolley problem, it doesn&#x27;t make sense to push someone off a bridge in order to save 5 people, this is very different from just flicking a switch for several reasons:<p>- There is a chance that this plan might fail and 6 people would get killed instead of 5.<p>- Maybe there is a reason why the 5 people are tied to train tracks - Honest people don&#x27;t usually end up like this - Maybe they&#x27;re in the mafia and their deaths would be an expected consequence of their high-risk criminal lifestyle. On the other hand, the guy standing on the bridge is more likely to be a regular person who did nothing wrong.<p>- You would go to jail for manslaughter.<p>- You would psychologically damage yourself by pushing the person off a bridge.<p>- Maybe you have an undiagnosed case of schizophrenia and the 5 people on the tracks are not real. The odds of it being an illusion (and that you are crazy) are probably higher than it being real - It&#x27;s quite arrogant to trust your own senses (to the point of killing someone) when you&#x27;re confronted with such an incredibly unlikely situation.
评论 #12521109 未加载
评论 #12520935 未加载
评论 #12521186 未加载
评论 #12520904 未加载
评论 #12521032 未加载
评论 #12521458 未加载
评论 #12521510 未加载
评论 #12520832 未加载
评论 #12520820 未加载
评论 #12521013 未加载
MandieD超过 8 年前
I definitely make &quot;cooler&quot; judgments in situations where I&#x27;m speaking German (learned while living here as a young adult) than I do in my native English. I also have never lost my temper in a German conversation like I occasionally do in English, but have gotten good and angry after, once I had some time to think about what was said.<p>So I see how discussing an issue in one&#x27;s second language could affect how likely someone is to use utilitarian morality.<p>It&#x27;s also harder to think about intent the same way in a second language you can work in, but that you weren&#x27;t raised in, so that might be part of why the result of actions appeared to matter more than their motivations to people reading about the situations in their second languages.
评论 #12522295 未加载
fenomas超过 8 年前
That trolley problem has always seemed fundamentally dishonest to me. It sets out to present two scenarios that are somehow morally equivalent, but they&#x27;re only equivalent for for people who magically know the outcomes of their actions.<p>That is, &quot;would you push a fat guy in front of a trolley if you knew it would save five lives?&quot; isn&#x27;t a question that&#x27;s relevant to human ethics. It would need to be &quot;would you push a fat in front of a trolley <i>because you thought</i> it would save five lives&quot; - and, implicitly, then bear the responsibility for your action if you were wrong?
评论 #12522381 未加载
评论 #12521624 未加载
评论 #12521785 未加载
gcoda超过 8 年前
Thinking in a Foreign Language Makes Decisions More Rational<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;04&#x2F;language-and-bias&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;04&#x2F;language-and-bias&#x2F;</a>
known超过 8 年前
&quot;How Morality Changes in a Foreign Language&quot; is the better title
thyrsus超过 8 年前
The article infers that &quot;the greatest good for the greatest number&quot; morality is the least likely to be dropped under the stress of operating in a second language (one catalog of the other components is here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Moral_foundations_theory" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Moral_foundations_theory</a>). Stipulating that, <i>should</i> you make the same choice in the absence of stress?
throwanem超过 8 年前
Dr. Sapir, Mr. Whorf, please call your offices...
评论 #12522394 未加载