TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Towards a GNU autonomous cloud

49 点作者 dharmatech大约 15 年前

6 条评论

forkandwait大约 15 年前
I can't believe I haven't put the words "Gnu" and "Facebook" together in my mind before....<p>Of course, something like this should be done. There are important questions about the technical architecture (I only ask one thing -- DONT USE XML...), especially because of privacy, but there are also opportunities to explicitly and collectively decide processes (Yay democracy!) -- if the users of FB could vote on issues of data sharing, things there might be really, really different.
评论 #1256352 未加载
zacharypinter大约 15 年前
I've had similar thoughts in the past and brought them up on HN here:<p><a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=625917" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=625917</a>
评论 #1255735 未加载
mark_l_watson大约 15 年前
I like the link posted in the first article comment: <a href="http://onesocialweb.org/" rel="nofollow">http://onesocialweb.org/</a> (except their code base is not up on github yet - hopefully soon) Written in Java, uses XMPP, and comes with an Android client - at least it sounds good.<p>The article has some interesting points but ideas without code for a prototype implementation to back them up is not very useful.
blasdel大约 15 年前
While impractical and reminiscent of 90s crypto-wankery (<i>oh no clipper chip</i>, et al), it's still far more worthwhile than what Stallman's been pushing lately about cloud services.<p>Stallman seems to think that users give a shit about software, as if everyone using the AGPL would somehow fix everything — except that thet's total bullshit — people only care about access to their <i>data</i>, the code serving it up is completely irrelevant. You wouldn't be able to run your own instance of Facebook on localhost anyway, even if that was somehow useful.<p>Stallman's refusal to use any cloud services leaves him woefully out of touch with the reality of their implications.
评论 #1257761 未加载
skybrian大约 15 年前
As stated this is far too ambitious a goal. But let's say we don't worry about traffic analysis and just protect the content. What would a minimal "git with privacy" look like?
评论 #1257747 未加载
naner大约 15 年前
This is absurd and will probably be about as successful as GNU Hurd.
评论 #1255588 未加载