TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

PostgreSQL 9.6 Released

553 点作者 sheff超过 8 年前

12 条评论

fabian2k超过 8 年前
Just from reading the documentation, the full text search features on Postgres already look pretty powerful. And it is encouraging that they are actively being worked on. I&#x27;m wondering how this compares to a dedicated search engine like Solr or Elasticsearch.<p>Are there huge differences in performance, features or search quality? At which scale does using Postgres for full text search still make sense?
评论 #12605253 未加载
评论 #12605227 未加载
评论 #12606159 未加载
评论 #12609783 未加载
评论 #12605899 未加载
评论 #12606740 未加载
评论 #12609224 未加载
评论 #12605807 未加载
评论 #12607385 未加载
评论 #12605911 未加载
评论 #12605254 未加载
评论 #12605614 未加载
评论 #12611690 未加载
评论 #12606092 未加载
snowwolf超过 8 年前
Please can the Postgres team put some major focus on completing logical replication [1]. It&#x27;s the missing piece to making upgrading across major versions painless and quick on large databases so that we can take advantage of all these nice new features. We&#x27;re on a Heroku&#x27;s hosted Postgres service so can&#x27;t install the pglogical extension.<p>1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.2ndquadrant.com&#x2F;why-logical-replication&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.2ndquadrant.com&#x2F;why-logical-replication&#x2F;</a>
评论 #12606327 未加载
评论 #12606413 未加载
评论 #12605850 未加载
ignoramous超过 8 年前
A tangential question:<p>Everyone speaks about InnoDB and how performant and reliable it is... and multiple firms even use it as a KV-store (Uber&#x2F;Pinterest&#x2F;AWS) bypassing MySQL entirely. I have never heard much about storage engines in Postgres, why could this be so?<p>Wikipedia has a (stub) article on InnoDB, but nothing on Postgres&#x27; storage engines... just wondering why that is.
评论 #12605155 未加载
评论 #12605134 未加载
评论 #12605097 未加载
评论 #12605179 未加载
评论 #12605995 未加载
评论 #12605109 未加载
评论 #12607962 未加载
评论 #12606561 未加载
评论 #12605104 未加载
评论 #12605138 未加载
评论 #12605178 未加载
malisper超过 8 年前
&gt; Index-only scans for partial indexes<p>This one is huge for my company. Almost every single query of ours could use an index-only scan, but the planner would never choose to perform one because of the weirdness around partial indexes. We expecting a several x speedup once we upgrade to 9.6. All the need to improve now is a way to keep the visibility map up to date without relying on vacuums.
评论 #12609236 未加载
评论 #12608781 未加载
jbkkd超过 8 年前
Congratulations to the PostgreSQL Global Development Group on a much-anticipated release.<p>Curious about this:<p>&gt; parallelism can speed up big data queries by as much as 32 times faster<p>Why would it be only 32 times faster? The sky&#x27;s the limit if there aren&#x27;t major bottlenecks on the way.
评论 #12605407 未加载
评论 #12605009 未加载
评论 #12605524 未加载
评论 #12605035 未加载
评论 #12605986 未加载
qaq超过 8 年前
Congrats on great release. With availability of E7-8800 v4 based servers (up to 192 cores in a single box) PG can cover a huge number of use cases without complicated setups.
mgberlin超过 8 年前
Does anyone know when this will be available on AWS RDS?
评论 #12606770 未加载
评论 #12606286 未加载
评论 #12606027 未加载
Roboprog超过 8 年前
Is it just selection bias from posted links on HN, or has the PostgreSQL team been doing many (feature) releases lately?<p>Sounds good!
评论 #12606053 未加载
评论 #12609331 未加载
gtrubetskoy超过 8 年前
Anyone know the state of BDR in 9.6?<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.2ndquadrant.com&#x2F;bdr-is-coming-to-postgresql-9-6&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.2ndquadrant.com&#x2F;bdr-is-coming-to-postgresql-9-6&#x2F;</a>
评论 #12604961 未加载
评论 #12606781 未加载
tmaly超过 8 年前
I am interested in the full text search as well as<p>Index-only scans for partial indexes
n4nagappan超过 8 年前
Does Postgres offer search based on tf-idf?
评论 #12613484 未加载
Chayanon1981超过 8 年前
kk