TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Free Lossless Image Format Publications

84 点作者 mdf超过 8 年前

9 条评论

snvzz超过 8 年前
When trying to promote an open format, LGPLv3 and such reference implementations aren&#x27;t exactly helping.<p>You&#x27;d want to maximize adoption, and there BSD can help. Adoption of Xiph.org&#x27;s Vorbis was in good part supported by such a decision.
评论 #12629691 未加载
评论 #12629401 未加载
d33超过 8 年前
Just a note that the project has undergone fuzzing by author: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;FLIF-hub&#x2F;FLIF&#x2F;issues&#x2F;57" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;FLIF-hub&#x2F;FLIF&#x2F;issues&#x2F;57</a>
评论 #12627314 未加载
jsingleton超过 8 年前
FLIF is pretty neat. I hope it takes off, which it might do as Jon works for Cloudinary.<p>I assume the news is this recent conference paper: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;flif.info&#x2F;papers&#x2F;FLIF_ICIP16.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;flif.info&#x2F;papers&#x2F;FLIF_ICIP16.pdf</a><p>It will be great when you only need one file for all of your responsive image versions and can just take the part you need. Plug - I wrote about this in my high performance web app book along with other types of compression (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.packtpub.com&#x2F;mapt&#x2F;book&#x2F;Application%20Development&#x2F;9781785881893&#x2F;4&#x2F;ch04lvl1sec24&#x2F;Compression" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.packtpub.com&#x2F;mapt&#x2F;book&#x2F;Application%20Development...</a>).
评论 #12630152 未加载
评论 #12631508 未加载
faragon超过 8 年前
How does it compare to fax Group 4 compression [1] or JBIG2 [2] for 1bpp -e.g. black and white- images?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Group_4_compression" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Group_4_compression</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;JBIG2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;JBIG2</a>
评论 #12633773 未加载
评论 #12630663 未加载
评论 #12632936 未加载
mistercow超过 8 年前
The thing about flif that feels good on the old noggin is the fact that you can trade off quality for size just by truncating the file. Imagine a decimal point at the beginning of the file, and your image is a number between 0 and 1. Approximate that number to N digits, and you get an approximation of your image.
评论 #12629558 未加载
mdf超过 8 年前
Apparently the WIP warning was also removed from the site lately[1]. Can we infer that the format is being finalized?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;FLIF-hub&#x2F;FLIF-hub.github.io&#x2F;commit&#x2F;2b9c8145522cf3eb1a62d260e42152e3bef38deb#diff-eacf331f0ffc35d4b482f1d15a887d3bL127" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;FLIF-hub&#x2F;FLIF-hub.github.io&#x2F;commit&#x2F;2b9c81...</a>
评论 #12629744 未加载
评论 #12628295 未加载
mark-r超过 8 年前
I&#x27;d be curious to see what the result would be if you took the <i>best</i> format for each individual image and added them together; would it be a significant difference over FLIF by itself?<p>The choice of GPLv3 licensing is unfortunate, since it will limit native browser support.
评论 #12628057 未加载
评论 #12627997 未加载
WhiteOwlLion超过 8 年前
How does this compare against Dropbox&#x27;s Lepton? Seems like any of these of image compression formats would make sense to support in archiving software like 7Zip, Winzip, Gzip, etc.
评论 #12629780 未加载
zylonbane超过 8 年前
So how is this project even surviving at all considering FFmpeg&#x27;s FFV1 beats it completely in terms of performance, format support and efficiency?
评论 #12627065 未加载
评论 #12627071 未加载
评论 #12627043 未加载