TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hyperloop – The Missing Ruby Front-end Library

106 点作者 geordee超过 8 年前

10 条评论

_uhtu超过 8 年前
I see a lot of people working really hard to use the same language on client and server, but I've never had any difficulty working with multiple languages nor have my teammates. The biggest advantage for using different languages for me is that it lets you get to choose the best tool for the job on both sides without compromising. Would anyone who holds the alternate view, that they have reaped significant advantages from using the same language on server and client, care to chime in?
评论 #12633273 未加载
评论 #12633735 未加载
评论 #12633231 未加载
评论 #12635746 未加载
评论 #12633448 未加载
评论 #12633233 未加载
评论 #12633259 未加载
评论 #12634605 未加载
评论 #12634050 未加载
评论 #12635040 未加载
评论 #12633229 未加载
gonyea超过 8 年前
Oh sweet jesus. This is erector all over again.<p>The code inside the blocks are uncacheable; it&#x27;s an expensive novelty. Plus these abstractions always break down. Our job is to build products that meet people&#x27;s needs. Not to contort solutions into our preferred form, at the expense of the product.
评论 #12634178 未加载
评论 #12633319 未加载
评论 #12649857 未加载
colordrops超过 8 年前
Is no one going to mention the Hyperloop name? The repo for this project was created Aug 2015, over two years after the SpaceX Hyperloop announcement. Seems like a really poor choice in naming both in creativity and in search keyword collision. I wonder what other poor decisions were made when building this library.
评论 #12633966 未加载
评论 #12634572 未加载
vinceguidry超过 8 年前
First off, I started moving away from DSLs awhile ago. Syntax and semantics are not something you just bolt on to code. I don&#x27;t care for JSX, but I like the idea of building HTML with Ruby even less. It can be done but I&#x27;d much rather just use a templating system. JSX is an ugly hack but I hate it less the more I work with it. I just use a convention to only put it in render methods and to have render methods only contain JSX. If you do that then JSX isn&#x27;t so bad.<p>Second, React is maintained by Facebook. This project is not. If you&#x27;re greenfielding an app and you base it on this framework rather than real React, then you better hope the app goes EOL before the framework maintainer decides to move on, otherwise you&#x27;re SOL.
评论 #12635787 未加载
ericb超过 8 年前
What an unbelievably negative group of drive-by comments for something I think is pretty impressive.
评论 #12635416 未加载
evolve2k超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m a Rubyist currently working with react &amp; redux, I&#x27;ve found the issue for me wasn&#x27;t the complexity of react but rather the client side data store, aka redux. Can you support redux or how are you handling this otherwise?
评论 #12634203 未加载
michaelmior超过 8 年前
Can mods fix the typo in the title?
raitom超过 8 年前
As a Ruby AND react developer I&#x27;ll definitely try it.
daenney超过 8 年前
Though it&#x27;s great to see these kind of efforts why did you pick a name that seems bound to cause discoverability and visibility issues?
评论 #12636386 未加载
yefim超过 8 年前
You were so busy wondering if you could do it you never stopped to ask if you should.