4chan is running out of money–and Martin Shkreli wants to help out

I love 4chan. It&#x27;s a bastion of raw unmitigated free speech and anonymity. Because of this, people naturally use it to say things they can&#x27;t normally in public or with a account that might be linked back to their real name.<p>There are no points, only replies. Unpopular opinions aren&#x27;t hidden. Popular opinions are boring and those threads disappear from a lack of replies. The most provocative threads are the ones which thrive. This is the exact opposite of voting sites like hacker news and Reddit.<p>We need a place like this to exist where people aren&#x27;t saddled with long term consequences for making their real opinions known. Users on 4chan are rewarded with replies for thinking outside of the box and breaking rank.<p>Losing it would be a terrible loss for discourse. Sure there are lots of trolls there. Yes there is lots of racism and offensive content and gore. If you dont like that sort of thing you are free to not go there. But there must be a place for people to hash these ideas out and get unpopular opinions off their chest.<p>Convenient anonymity on the Internet is dying, and if it does ultimately go so will freedom of speech. Because nobody will be free to speak their mind when a deviant or unpopular opinion may incur the wrath of a targeted campaign against them to destroy their professional and private life at any point in the future. Especially when those opinions which were once common are now out of style. (See Brandon Eich or Palmer Luckey)<p>The lack of rules and consequences is precisely the reason 4chan has always been a creative powerhouse where trends and content are born at a rate that is unmatched elsewhere. Some of the funniest things I&#x27;ve read have come from the unrestrained banter between people from different countries on the &#x2F;int&#x2F; (international) board.<p>Despite all this, it&#x27;s always been difficult to keep that place above water. They need a sort of Reddit gold type epiphany.

I recall several netizens posting concern about the buyer of 4chan, how he ran some other Japanese sites into the ground. Now on &#x2F;. there is someone claiming the new owner turned ads down and tried to promote 4chan passes, which now don&#x27;t work.<p>Another person points out that even if you hate 4chan (or especially if you do), it&#x27;d be better left intact to contain the culture that foments there. Otherwise we might see &#x2F;r&#x2F;The_Donald style posts all over the internet.<p>In any case, when you avoid the dregs of the site, the other boards can have unique and even informative discussion.

4chan is viable as an anonymous and ephemeral p2p implementation, 4chan has always suffered from the cost of running the service, which is kept to a minimum (relative to say, reddit) due to the lack of persistence. It can thrive with a peer-to-peer infrastructure since the need for advertising to sustain running costs would disappear, add encryption, restrict content to images and text to avoid the RIAA or MPAA getting close and it could be a veritable outlet for unabridged and uncensored views.

I guess they deserve each other?