TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hillary Clinton's Wall St Speeches Published by Wikileaks

51 点作者 JohnHammersley超过 8 年前

14 条评论

xapata超过 8 年前
I've only seen a few quotes from these leaked transcripts, but they've been in articles claiming very damaging statements. Instead, the quotes seem to be mostly benign comments and nothing shocking.
评论 #12666686 未加载
评论 #12666754 未加载
potrebitel超过 8 年前
Pardon my ignorance, but I cannot help myself understanding why WikiLeaks are pushing so much crap towards Clinton and not doing the same to Trump ?<p>Are they in-directly supporting Trump ?<p>I am far from USA and although who will be the next president most likely will affect everyone, I do not care that much for either one of them.<p>It is just strange for the russians to push so much for Trump and WikiLeaks are somehow assisting them.
评论 #12666689 未加载
评论 #12666644 未加载
评论 #12666738 未加载
评论 #12666658 未加载
评论 #12667250 未加载
评论 #12666680 未加载
评论 #12666651 未加载
评论 #12668568 未加载
评论 #12666664 未加载
评论 #12666659 未加载
评论 #12666699 未加载
评论 #12666724 未加载
评论 #12666636 未加载
gremlinsinc超过 8 年前
&quot;After the dust has settled in this election, the divisions within the Democratic ranks will likely re-emerge&quot; -- as a lifelong democract&#x2F;progressive I can say honestly that the divisions have NOT been mended for this election.<p>I&#x27;m supporting Jill Stein even though I feel she&#x27;s a little over the top personality wise and a little odd. Bernie was the right amount of crazy progressive while working within the confines of what he was given. I will never support another Democrat until the party is ripped a part or totally reformed. Case closed. The only exception are ones that run under against trade, have strong climate change policies, and are against corporate money and corruption in politics.<p>We desperately need to pass the anti-corruption act on a national level getting all corporate donations out of politics. Money is a &#x27;vote&#x27; and corporations should not have a say it&#x27;s &quot;we the people&quot; not &quot;we the corporations and a few people who we allow to matter&quot;.
drinchev超过 8 年前
Can someone elaborate how pro-globalization speech can hurt her campaign?<p>As far as I can see the leaks are not corruption evidence of some sort.<p>Disclaimer I&#x27;m away from politics and US.
评论 #12666709 未加载
评论 #12666737 未加载
评论 #12666693 未加载
评论 #12666646 未加载
评论 #12666655 未加载
freddref超过 8 年前
&quot;Mrs Clinton told bankers that they were best-placed to help reform the US financial sector&quot; - which is true, but she failed to mention that was also the problem.<p>Bankers are in the best position to reform, but the most unlikely to provide meaningful reform.<p>edit: formatting, emoticon removal
adam12超过 8 年前
Not one mention of this on CNN or MSNBC this morning. It disappoints me how rigged this election.<p>edit 1: It is however on their websites. The Clinton campaign was smart to counter attack. I still would expect them to cover this on tv, though.<p>edit 2: CNN is covering it now.
extra88超过 8 年前
So this is the result of a pretty recent hack. Publishing the speeches would&#x27;ve done a lot more harm early in the primaries, making it harder for Clinton to shift her emphasis (and occasionally positions) in response to Sanders.
评论 #12666736 未加载
评论 #12666758 未加载
Dowwie超过 8 年前
So.. what is the worst that has come out of these speeches? Clinton probably withheld the speeches to disarm her opponents, not because she said something so outrageous that in itself would destroy her chances of presidency.
评论 #12666753 未加载
thaw13579超过 8 年前
Meta-question, is this considered on-topic for HN? I wonder how it is distinguished from another notable leak about another candidate that hasn&#x27;t made the front page.
评论 #12666829 未加载
microcolonel超过 8 年前
Does anyone think that if the corporate news media, owned almost exclusively by avid Clinton supporters, would hold <i>anything</i> back on Trump if they had it? Maybe there&#x27;s just more data on Clinton, dirty or clean.<p>It&#x27;s amazing how quickly they blame Russia. Russia may be a shrewd international manipulator, but that doesn&#x27;t mean that every time data come out on the Clintons, they&#x27;re from some 400 pound dude in the Kremlin.<p>Have people considered that Trump has had considerably less public interaction, and is not tied to as many organizations as Hillary is? I mean, there could be lots of good reasons why all the dirt we can find is on her.
评论 #12666938 未加载
评论 #12666734 未加载
Upvoter33超过 8 年前
i suspect Assange is going to be enemy #1 of the Clinton administration...
评论 #12666716 未加载
hayksaakian超过 8 年前
what systems are in place to prevent posts like this one from disappearing off the front page thanks to flag brigades?
AlexCoventry超过 8 年前
Anyone got a link to the transcripts?
评论 #12666739 未加载
icantdrive55超过 8 年前
Nothing game changing, but she&#x27;s obviously very happy with the current status of this--great economy, and our wonderful foreign leaders. These fair, moralistic, truthful, immune to corruption Foreign leaders.<p>&quot;My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders,&quot;<p>Yes--it worked well for her, and the wealthy.<p>It hasen&#x27;t helped me much? Oh, wait----I&#x27;m waiting on 6 X 6v halogen bulbs for my microscope. They are coming from China. It&#x27;s been 26 days. They cost me $9.99. Free shipping picked up by the Chinese government. If I get them; I will have benefitted! Yea!<p>&quot;Mrs Clinton told bankers that they were best-placed to help reform the US financial sector.&quot;<p>Oh really? Banks won&#x27;t lend to me. They raised my fees to jaw dropping levels. I sometimes wonder why I even have a bank account.<p>I probally won&#x27;t vote this year. I don&#x27;t think it will matter who gets into office. Part of myself is hoping for Trump. He will throughly piss everyone off, and maybe we can regain some democtractic congressional seats?<p>As to the all important Supreme Court nominees; just because they go in conservative, doesn&#x27;t mean they won&#x27;t do a bed flip while in office? History has proved this, or at least that&#x27;s what Dr. Helbright said in political Science 101 in that hot classroom years ago. I did double check his claim, at the time. Why did that conservative justice (Robert&#x27;s) save Obamacare? They are not robots. They seem to get more understanding with age? It&#x27;s not so black&#x2F;white when in their glory days, with the exception of Clarance Thomas. He is quite the consistent guy?<p>I&#x27;m not a Rebublican, or Democrat. I&#x27;m still waiting for the right party&#x2F;person. And it&#x27;s not that other idiot. Forget his name, but my goodness--is he fried, or just ------?