Were start-ups squeezed by hiring in 2004-2007?<p>Joining a pre-funding start-up is a <i>huge</i> decision which takes dedication, passion for and expertise in the company's focus. It's a lot closer to starting a company yourself than working for Google. Salary is not the deciding factor, engineers considering such a decision are very specific in what they're looking for. From the company's point of view, first non-founding engineer is an employee that can make or break a company and set the engineering culture. It's a mistake to take someone who's only there because he had nowhere else to go: the sort of people you want for that position are confident that they could get hired elsewhere, even in a recession.<p>On the other hand, funded early-on start-ups (i.e., post series A, but pre-revenue/follow-on funding) can afford to pay market salaries, unless they're hiring "warm bodies" which is again a mistake. The <i>big</i> way to save is by hiring less engineers, not by paying engineers less. The way to make do with less engineers is to go for quality instead of quantity: you're always going to be paying top dollar for top talent.