TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: SnapEDA Plugins – Find parts inside your circuit board design software

29 点作者 natashabaker超过 8 年前

4 条评论

natashabaker超过 8 年前
Dear HN community,<p>I posted last month about our startup SnapEDA which makes free symbols and footprints available in multiple design formats when we released InstaPart: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12571200" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12571200</a>.<p>We just built new plugins so that you can search SnapEDA right inside your design tool and thought I&#x27;d post again to share it (hope that&#x27;s ok with everyone). These new plugins are for Altium and Eagle. The plugins allow you to search models without having to leave your design environment.<p>This is a beta, so would love any feedback you might have. One thing on our roadmap is to add cloud-syncing of the libraries and user authentication right from the plugin. Would love to hear your thoughts on other features to add next!
评论 #12755332 未加载
robert_foss超过 8 年前
I feel like the KiCad support is lacking. As the community EDA of choice, support for it is quite important.<p>What I would really like to so is a repository of 3D models. Footprints are a dime a dozen and faster to churn out than 3D models. Also, most EDA suites support creating footprints&#x2F;symbols but few&#x2F;none support 3D modeling.<p>Also I&#x27;ve had SnapEDA provide me with footprints of similar parts that in actuality were not similar enough. A fair chunk of time was wasted on that.
评论 #12755350 未加载
评论 #12755574 未加载
评论 #12755527 未加载
blackguardx超过 8 年前
My feedback as an EE with 10 years experience:<p>I think your InstaPart feature looks cool. Lots of big companies have CAD teams that just make component libraries for designers. It is nice to get a bit of that on the small side of the industry finally.<p>That being said, limiting it to 5&#x2F;month is very constraining. Can you accrue InstaParts? I think most designers typically need more than that per project, but not necessarily each month.
评论 #12757084 未加载
bsder超过 8 年前
Sigh. I don&#x27;t need <i>yet another</i> plugin for my generic parts--that you&#x27;re going to try to monetize on me eventually if you achieve lock in.<p>Let me be blunt. I don&#x27;t need <i>extensions or features</i> to my PCB tools. Certainly not &quot;Yet Another Database Frontend(tm) You Can Rent&quot;.<p>I my tools to fscking <i>WORK</i>.<p>I need a tool that runs, fast, on Windows, Linux, and even OS X.<p>I need bug fixes for the features that they actually have.<p>I need a tool that lets me script things in a modern programming language.<p>I need an autorouter that doesn&#x27;t suck. This will never happen because our algorithms don&#x27;t like to work with PCB limitations of small numbers of layers and obstacles that penetrate multiple layers.<p><i>ALL</i> the PCB software tools are buggy piles of garbage because the amount of money in that industry is now fixed. Charitably: everybody is trying to extract rent instead of innovate. Uncharitably: nobody actually in development actually knows how the board designers use their tools anymore.<p>If you want to go chase a field, go chase Cadence, Mentor and Synopsys up into the real EDA market where <i>algorithms</i> matter. Creating $10000-level tools that can do actual VLSI design to take advantage of the fact that transistors are stupidly cheap in volume would kick off the custom silicon revolution everybody has been promising.
评论 #12755743 未加载
评论 #12755932 未加载
评论 #12758071 未加载