TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cheerleading with an agenda: how the press covers science

39 点作者 vvdcect超过 8 年前

5 条评论

chillingeffect超过 8 年前
This reflects my experience in academia so much better than my rants over beers and BBQ ever have.<p>I had no idea, but should have suspected, that Bernays was behind it all.
threepipeproblm超过 8 年前
Thanks for this post. The description of the attempt to treat scientific knowledge as a commodity reminds me of a quote I like by Dr. Ray Peat:<p>&quot;Knowledge isn&#x27;t a commodity, especially not a fungible commodity, as the medical business sees it. Consciousness and culture are part of the life process. It is exactly the commoditization of medical knowledge that makes it dangerous, and generally stupid. Doctors buy their knowledge and then resell it over and over; it&#x27;s valuable as a commodity, so its value has to be protected by the equivalent of a copyright, the system of laws establishing the profession. Without its special status, its worthlessness would be quickly demonsrated...&quot; -- Ray Peat, PhD.
adrianratnapala超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m inclined to agree with the article, but it&#x27;s a bit of a ramble. I wish it explored what motivates of journalists to become cheerleeders. I can take guesses, but those guesses are just speculation:<p>guess 1: Publishers want to cultivate relations with big institutions that are the sources of their stories.<p>guess 2: Individual journalists enjoy the prestige of being associated with big-name institutes.<p>Are either of the above correct? Are there other possibilities.
评论 #12796748 未加载
stevetrewick超过 8 年前
Weird article. Author seems less concerned that academics and journalists may have <i>an</i> agenda and more that it&#x27;s the <i>wrong</i> agenda.
analog31超过 8 年前
<i>In 1894, science fiction writer, journalist and eugenics proponent H.G. Wells, ...</i><p>Mention of eugenics contributed nothing to the article, other than to create an emotional atmosphere.
评论 #12793025 未加载
评论 #12793044 未加载
评论 #12793006 未加载