TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data

540 点作者 suprgeek超过 8 年前

20 条评论

devindotcom超过 8 年前
Interestingly there seems to be a loophole in that they can <i>collect</i> the data regardless of consent, but can&#x27;t <i>use or share</i> it without consent. So chances are this sensitive data will be recorded and put in a database anyway, even if they&#x27;re not lawfully allowed to look at it without anonymizing first - but a future law could also add an exception, keeping things for law enforcement for instance.<p>I&#x27;m triple checking with the FCC on this though.
评论 #12812306 未加载
评论 #12810960 未加载
评论 #12811591 未加载
评论 #12813744 未加载
评论 #12810999 未加载
评论 #12811596 未加载
评论 #12810979 未加载
ars超过 8 年前
This is completely pointless. They&#x27;ll just add some form you have to sign before giving you service and that&#x27;s about it.<p>After all, do you read and act on the privacy notifications other providers give you?<p>Does this at least require them to provider service irregardless of your consent to share data? If not, this is a pointless law that just makes it look like they did something.
评论 #12810497 未加载
评论 #12810382 未加载
评论 #12810442 未加载
评论 #12810312 未加载
评论 #12813988 未加载
评论 #12810389 未加载
评论 #12810447 未加载
评论 #12815057 未加载
评论 #12810452 未加载
anigbrowl超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m sure this will lead to radical alterations on paragraph 117 of the typical EULA, where everyone will notice it immediately and have a serious think about the economic value of their personal identifiable information. I have not looked at the actual motion yet but I suspect that companies will only have to answer consumer inquiries in general terms rather than giving them detailed statement. Oh well I&#x27;ve given up trying to safeguard my privacy anyway.
评论 #12810345 未加载
makecheck超过 8 年前
If the data is collected at all, it can be collected incorrectly (e.g. stored in such a way that it is stolen eventually, “permissions” be damned). Still solving the wrong fundamental issue.<p>We desperately need to work on reducing the importance of data itself. We must assume by default that all information <i>will</i> be improperly handled pretty much anywhere (or, that the task of keeping it secure indefinitely is just too hard).<p>That means: data whose usefulness expires extremely quickly (with corresponding protocols), and the complete retirement of stupid bits of information we now carry like social security numbers and credit card numbers that can instantly screw you in the wrong hands. In fact, we ought to have proxies for EVERYTHING; I don’t know why I even have to hand out my home address, for instance, when in theory I could give a company some temporary proxy address that routes to my house only as long as I ALLOW that forwarding; after that, it becomes meaningless and cannot be used for junk mail.
afarrell超过 8 年前
I wish the UK had this. Mobile phone&#x2F;data providers send a header with HTTP requests to provide the site with your phone number which they can then use to charge you without permission.
评论 #12811831 未加载
评论 #12810616 未加载
评论 #12811066 未加载
评论 #12810718 未加载
wmf超过 8 年前
I am kind of surprised that this wasn&#x27;t already regulated, considering that telephone privacy has been an issue for decades. Perhaps this is a case of an unwritten common-sense policy that is only being codified when ISPs start to break it (e.g. AT&amp;T&#x27;s now-canceled &quot;Internet Preferences&quot;).
评论 #12810969 未加载
supergeek133超过 8 年前
In theory they were supposed to have my permission before sharing with the government too... right? Not sure what this stops.<p>Think of it like when you authorize facebook or someone else to share data via OAuth, how many people read that list?
评论 #12811822 未加载
revelation超过 8 年前
Maybe they can now regulate that ISPs can not modify IP payload?<p>What world are we living in where the post service is allowed to rip open mail and deface it.
评论 #12810446 未加载
MayMuncher超过 8 年前
I wonder if this applies to airport or arena wifi. Would they be considered an ISP if they are providing internet to mobile devices?
评论 #12810509 未加载
dsr_超过 8 年前
&quot;Commissioner Ajit Pai, who voted no, cautioned that the &quot;cold reality&quot; is that nothing in the new rules will stop those companies from &quot;harvesting and monetizing your data,&quot; including the websites visited, YouTube videos watched or search terms entered on any device.&quot;<p>Any reasonable person reading that would infer that Pai thinks that these rules are not sufficient and is in favor of stricter rules. That turns out not to be the case at all.
Frogolocalypse超过 8 年前
Remember the hoo-haa when Wheeler was appointed chairman of the FCC? He seems to have proven his detractors wrong.
jgord超过 8 年前
..because the fact that your _paying_ them, along with the general morality, is in itself not enough of an inducement.
mankash666超过 8 年前
About time
评论 #12809918 未加载
mirimir超过 8 年前
No matter what anyone says, it&#x27;s prudent to assume that everything is logged.
1812Overture超过 8 年前
We have a monopoly. Sign this or you don&#x27;t get internet.
评论 #12811306 未加载
elhenrico超过 8 年前
It&#x27;s there any way to obfuscate my browsing data? As in a program that visits random sites. I&#x27;ve searched but never found something like this.
6DM超过 8 年前
After this comes an &quot;update&quot; to your privacy statement where you have to agree or you loose service...
macawfish超过 8 年前
&quot;the vote was 3-2 along party lines&quot;<p>for real?
cloudjacker超过 8 年前
Permission like an android app
thomasthomas超过 8 年前
lots of power for an entity of unelected officials....
评论 #12811107 未加载