TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask YC: Who Are the Startup Friendly Accounting Firms?

13 点作者 whycombo大约 17 年前
I've heard PG say one key element of Viaweb getting acquired was that they had a top brand accounting firm which gave great credibility to their books. He felt it contributed a lot to sealing the deal with Yahoo.<p>Does anyone know who Viaweb used or who is considered the Wilson Sonsini of startup accounting?

4 条评论

bootload大约 17 年前
<i>"... I've heard PG say one key element of Viaweb getting acquired was that they had a top brand accounting firm which gave great credibility to their books. ..."</i><p>Where did you <i>'hear'</i> that? Have you mixed this up with Viaweb engaging a top <i>"PR"</i> firm [0] to get better exposure? [1] It's still a good question though.<p>[0] <i>"... When we started our startup in 1995, the first three were our biggest expenses. We had to pay $5000 for the Netscape Commerce Server, the only software that then supported secure http connections. We paid $3000 for a server with a 90 MHz processor and 32 meg of memory. And we paid a PR firm about $30,000 to promote our launch. ..."</i> ~ <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/vcsqueeze.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulgraham.com/vcsqueeze.html</a><p>[1] <i>"... Our startup spent its entire marketing budget on PR: at a time when we were assembling our own computers to save money, we were paying a PR firm $16,000 a month ... Our PR firm was one of the best in the business. In 18 months, they got press hits in over 60 different publications"</i> ~ <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html</a>
评论 #128392 未加载
评论 #128557 未加载
skmurphy大约 17 年前
If you are pre-funded neither PWC nor EY, who do most of the tech accounting in Silicon Valley, will want to engage. There are a number of part-time, interim, and "rent a CFO" firms who are more appropriate for early stage startups.<p>Very early on you are better off selecting a small firm to help you with the basics of bookkeeping and taxes until you either raise a real A round (e.g. $4M or more) or have significant revenue. Ask your attorney for a "due diligence" checklist: both funding and acquisition teams tend to look for the same documents and disclosures. The more you can keep all of that straight and documented from the beginning (e.g. purchase agreements, license agreements, major supplier contracts, ...) the easier it is later on.
ojbyrne大约 17 年前
Random guess - one of the "Big Five" <a href="http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/3003864?f=search" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/3003864?f=search</a>
评论 #128188 未加载
fallentimes大约 17 年前
But the Big 4 are also notorious for very high fees. I'm guessing it's someone who is affordable enough for a startup, but who has the clout, capacity and expertise to help ensure a successful acquisition or IPO.