Angular 3 is hot on the heels of Angular 2

&gt; when features are to be deprecated, the Angular team will let developers know ahead of time and keep supporting that feature for two major release cycles<p>&gt; Wormald promised a new major version twice a year from now on.<p>So... Support for deprecated features for one year? Hahahahaha. &lt;sniff&gt; Whooo, feels good to laugh.

<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dayssincelastjavascriptframework.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dayssincelastjavascriptframework.com&#x2F;</a>

Keeping up with the treadmill is just getting exhausting. I&#x27;m too young to be getting this cynical. I&#x27;m happy that most of my codebase is built on battle-tested, well-understood, libraries that are 3-5 years old... Happiness really is a boring stack.

Why would Google want that? Why would developers want that? I hate when features are deprecated and what I hate more than that is meaningless versioning. If you&#x27;re going to constantly change something, keep it in beta channel until you decide. I can see adding a few features every so often but a major version twice a year?

Oh good, I was just thinking we needed more churn in javascript frameworks.

lol, I thought they had already included every programming concept into ng2, what&#x27;s left for 3? ;)

Someone asked me why I thought using Angular was a bad idea for a long term view.<p>All I had to say was &quot;ask the knockoutjs guys how they&#x27;re finding new recruits on the market&quot;.

Disregard