TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Computer Security Experts Urge Clinton Campaign to Challenge Election Results

32 点作者 joshwa超过 8 年前

3 条评论

dang超过 8 年前
Most comments moved to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13022968" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13022968</a>.
runesoerensen超过 8 年前
This story is currently being suppressed from the front page and I&#x27;m not sure it should be. I suspect the reason is that none of the researchers who raised this issue have gone on record for the article.<p>Readers should be advised about that and take it into consideration when assessing the validity of the story. That being said, notable security researchers seem to find it interesting considering the merits of the team:<p>- <i>&quot;I don&#x27;t know what to think about this since nothing is on record. But Alex Halderman is a serious researcher.&quot;</i> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;matthew_d_green&#x2F;status&#x2F;801211739769597953" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;matthew_d_green&#x2F;status&#x2F;80121173976959795...</a><p>- <i>&quot;Wowze. I&#x27;ve not looked into this myself. But if Halderman says there should be an audit, there should be an audit.&quot;</i> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;zeynep&#x2F;status&#x2F;801207035324866560" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;zeynep&#x2F;status&#x2F;801207035324866560</a><p>- <i>&quot;Concur. Prof. Halderman is a legit expert on voting security.&quot;</i> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;csoghoian&#x2F;status&#x2F;801212140912865280" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;csoghoian&#x2F;status&#x2F;801212140912865280</a><p>Also:<p>- <i>PEOPLE! An audit is called for is not &quot;the election was stolen.&quot; Team raising questions is credible; they should be listened to. That&#x27;s all.</i> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;zeynep&#x2F;status&#x2F;801217522741690368" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;zeynep&#x2F;status&#x2F;801217522741690368</a><p>- <i>I also get why people wouldn&#x27;t want to look into this. Still: the integrity of voting machines seems like something you want to be sure of.</i> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;matthew_d_green&#x2F;status&#x2F;801218858484957184" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;matthew_d_green&#x2F;status&#x2F;80121885848495718...</a>
评论 #13019127 未加载
评论 #13018916 未加载
scott_c超过 8 年前
So what happened to all the talk before the election about accepting the results as Democracy?<p>...What happened is that the people that said this expected to win the election..but didn&#x27;t.<p>It really shows me that most people are phonies and they only believe in their own self-interests. The founding fathers were brilliant when they designed the electoral college. It stopped a criminal from becoming president.<p>You would think that the Democrats would learn from their mistakes. Rather than being bigoted, painting all opposing viewpoints with the same brush (while expecting more acceptance in return), and censoring free speech, you need to figure out why people voted for Trump.<p>Otherwise, we will have a 2-term president with no Democrats in sight for many years.<p>edit: The downvotes proves my point. Thanks! :-)
评论 #13024796 未加载
评论 #13019064 未加载
评论 #13019144 未加载