TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Acquiring administrative access to Azure's RedHat Update infrastructure

93 点作者 imduffy15超过 8 年前

8 条评论

matt_wulfeck超过 8 年前
&gt; <i>Given no gpgcheck is enabled, with full administrative access to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Appliance REST API one could have uploaded packages that would be acquired by client virtual machines on their next yum update.</i><p>And given how hard it is to detect backdoor software, this is a HUGE security blunder. This could have literally installed a rootkit on every rhel instance on Azure.
评论 #13045341 未加载
imduffy15超过 8 年前
Follow up post for anyone that is interested... You&#x27;ve got root, can you get more access to the users azure account? The answer is yes. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ianduffy.ie&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;27&#x2F;azure-bug-bounty-root-to-storage-account-administrator&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ianduffy.ie&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;27&#x2F;azure-bug-bounty-root-to-...</a>
colinbartlett超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m curious to know if a bounty was paid for this and how much.
评论 #13043989 未加载
matthiasb超过 8 年前
There was a thread yesterday where lots of people were complaining about HSMs (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13031155" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13031155</a>). I think this is an example where it would have helped to secure the private key in an HSM instead of the server itself.<p>Now the author states the keys have been rotated but now the next hacker know where to look.
评论 #13043994 未加载
joneholland超过 8 年前
So, it seems that the attack vector was that Microsoft was running RHUI Log Collector open to the public internet for some reason.<p>Considering that&#x27;s from Redhat, and not Microsoft, I do wonder if this is a non sensible default setup issue and there may be many enterprises running this out in the open.
评论 #13046349 未加载
ChargingWookie超过 8 年前
Am I misreading this or does this really allow arbitrary packages to masquerade as legitimate packages?!
评论 #13045346 未加载
shshhdhs超过 8 年前
It sounds like they fixed the RHEL Update infrastructure, but they didn&#x27;t fix this:<p>&quot;Additionally, if you duplicated a Red Hat Enterprise Linux virtual hard disk and created a new instance from it all billing association seemed to be lost but repository access was still available&quot;
评论 #13043979 未加载
bhaisaab超过 8 年前
Another reason to be away from MS cloud. Good work man.